La Condición Colectiva Como Un Reflejo De La Condición Individual
Published January 27, 2010 Dar , Igualdad , Miedo , Política , Progreso 1 CommentActualmente hay un desequilibrio enorme en el mundo – 80% de los recursos planetarios se consumen por menos del 20% de la población. Uno de los resultados de ese desequilibrio es la violencia. Cuando las necesidades básicas de los individuos no son contestadas, entonces su reacción ante eso es la violencia. En un principio no es siquiera violencia, sino un golpe, un entumecimiento, un cierto temor y pánico, que tan sólo después se convierte en enojo, violencia y venganza. Y de esa manera el ciclo empieza a perpetuarse y la violencia acaba por producir más violencia. Para acabar con el ciclo hay entonces que que eliminar el problema desde su raíz, en lugar de invertir nuestro tiempo, energía, y recursos económicos en combatir sus consecuencias.
Ayer comentaba a unos amigos que yo creo que cualquier persona que tenga el tiempo y las herramientas para pensar en ello, llegará a la conclusión de que si todos tuviésemos nuestras necesidades básicas contestadas (vivienda, comida, salud) el mundo cambiará para mejor y los niveles de problemas como la violencia y la criminalidad bajarían drásticamente. Las personas dejarían de trabajar para sobrevivir y pasarían a trabajar en algo que les gusta. Nadie tendría que pasar por la humillación del hambre, de la falta de hogar, o de la enfermedad desatendida. Pero la cuestión no es si todos llegaríamos o no a la misma conclusión, sino si todos estaríamos dispuestos a abdicar de un poco de nuestra calidad de vida para materializar esa conclusión. Y es justamente en eso que se basan la mayoría de los problemas que experimentamos en nuestro día a día; en nuestra incapacidad de dar y de compartir con lo demás; en nuestra insistencia en creer que no hay suficiente de lo que deseamos para todos.
¿No será nuestra condición colectiva un simple reflejo de nuestra condición individual?
Someone recently told me that we were born to die; that our whole life was a sequence of events that would take us closer to that supposedly final stage of life that we call death. Hearing this made me think. I don’t feel that none of us were born to die. I fell that all of us were born to live. The essence of life goes beyond the material world that we see around us and true life, in the words of many religious people, goes beyond our own physical existences, including the moment of physical death. So what is the purpose of all of this? What is the purpose of our existence? I feel that through us God makes Herself manifest and is able to know Herself. I don’t feel that God is somewhere outside of ourselves. I feel that each and everyone of us is a part of that which we call God, or in other words, all that exists is God. What amazes me is that through human beings Nature became able to appreciate itself. We are matter with consciousness, matter which is able to perceive and appreciate itself. Matter which is able to know itself. Like the flower that blossoms under the presence of light, so does the consciousness of man flourishes under the awareness of God. And the more we open ourselves to Life, the more does Life opens Itself to us. Each step moves us on to the realization that we are spectacular beings. We are beings capable of changing the world around us and defining our own future. However, unless there is action, awareness alone becomes worthless. It is time for all of us who are aware to stand up and put our energies into creating that incredible future that all of mankind dreams of.
Si todo el fanatismo es condenable por el poder que tiene de obliterar la razón e impedir que el hombre ejercite su raciocinio, el religioso es sin duda alguna el más nocivo de todos. El fanatismo religioso genera odios y pasiones, siendo capaz de llevar al hombre a cometer los actos más inhumanos y los crímenes más abominables. En la historia de la humanidad no existen guerras tan bárbaras, tan implacables, tan crueles, tan feroces, tan brutales, tan increíblemente perversas como las que fueron inspiradas por la religión. El hombre, espíritu creador por excelencia, cuando es influenciado por la falsa idea de los milagros y de la ayuda divina, se vuelve un ser espiritualmente inerte, incapaz de ayudarse a si mismo o a los demás. La religión, tal y como la conocemos hoy en día, anestesia al hombre, su voluntad y su pensamiento. Y por eso, es esencial que todo aquél que de verdad desee conocerse a sí mismo y a su verdadera naturaleza, se aparte de la senda de la religión. Tan sólo buscando en nuestro propio corazón, libres de limitaciones y de cuentos fantásticos, podemos conocer aquello que nos une a todos los seres humanos. Es a través de esa inverosímil bendición a la que llamamos vida, refracción innegable de ese todo del cual todos hacemos parte, soplo de un amor tan grande que jamás podría caber en un sólo hombre, que conoceremos a lo que las religiones del mundo llamaron de Díos. La verdadera religión es aquella que se encuentra impresa en el corazón del hombre.
Ancient Ways Of Living
Published January 1, 2010 Capitalism , Consumerism , Uncategorized Leave a Comment
Our culture and way of living are destroying our planet. We are taught from a young age that progress is a synonymous of technological development and productive capacity. We believe that the more quickly and efficiently we produce, the more advanced we are. This is obviously a cultural myth and in reality true progress is measured by the social and moral development of a species, rather than its productive capacity.
The survival of the capitalist system that we live in depends in part on certain cultural myths. One of them is that labour and consumption are the centre of our lives. This cultural myth is especially predominant in Western societies and it is critical for the continuation and maintenance of the current social and economical structures. In fact, we tend to use our work in order to give a meaning to our lives and through consumption we tend to improve our self-esteem. The relation between labour/wages/social status is clear in the world we inhabit: peoples’ jobs determine not only their salary, but also their social status and their ability to feel personal satisfaction. What is fascinating to me about all of this is that the more we achieve and the more that we get, the more we understand that our true nature is not material and that worldly things cannot satisfy us completely.
Another cultural myth is that when we think of indigenous tribes of the past, we have a tendency to think of them as less evolved than ourselves. However, many of these tribes only dedicated 4 hours a day to work, while the rest of the time was dedicated to leisure and social relations and activities. The relationship of these tribes with nature was also far superior to ours, since they lived in harmony with the ecosystem they lived in and respected their environment. Social problems such as hunger, crime, or violence between tribes were virtually nonexistent.
In our supposedly developed world though, hunger, poverty, crime, violence, pollution, the daily extinction of hundreds of other species, are common problems! And this brings me to a question – are we as advanced as we like to think? Or is there a valuable lesson that we urgently need to learn from these ancient ways of living?
El tráfico de niños es una realidad que se da en varios países del mundo, especialmente en aquellos más necesitados. Se calcula que unos 60 millones de niños son víctimas del tráfico infantil en la India y el “precio” que se baraja con ellos, oscila entre los 9 y los 40 euros. Estos son los datos que proporciona la ONG Bachpan Bachao Andolan (BBA).
Si verdaderamente se da esta situación, es incomprensible que las autoridades competentes de la India no tomen verdaderas cartas en el asunto. Diversas manifestaciones por parte de la población, han solicitado que se ponga fin a esta dramática situación y la ONG ha solicitado en reiteradas ocasiones varias enmiendas a la actual ley de Prevención de Tráfico Inmoral para que se sancione como merece a quienes realizan el tráfico infantil.
Niños de todas las edades se ven sometidos a esta práctica, en anteriores ocasiones ya hemos mencionado otros problemas sufridos por los niños de la India, como puede ser el abandono, la desnutrición y la alta tasa de mortalidad infantil, a esto hay que añadir, ser víctimas del tráfico infantil. Pero lamentablemente esto no acaba aquí, en este país además se registran hasta dos millones y medio de infanticidios.
Posiblemente la India no sea el mejor país para que un niño tenga garantizado unos mínimos derechos, demasiados problemas se ciernen sobre ellos y sería necesaria alguna medida de presión por parte de las organizaciones internacionales que pueda evitar estos tristes acontecimientos, es para quedarse sin palabras.
Innovar es crear; crear a partir de lo que sabemos, enlazando, mezclando, y produciendo una combinación única y diferente de lo que conocíamos hasta entonces. Este proceso se puede apreciar claramente en un simple libro. El autor escribe a partir de diferentes ideas y conceptos que ha absorbido a lo largo de su vida, los combina y crea una aproximación personal y única; una aproximación innovadora. Pero, ¿cómo podemos crear algo a partir de la nada? Eso es sumamente imposible ya que toda creación surge de algo. Por eso, es importante que absorbamos, escuchemos y sinteticemos íntimamente la información a nuestro alrededor, porque sólo así seremos capaces de ser nosotros mismos agentes de innovación. Todos nosotros poseemos un potencial único y especial dentro de nuestros corazones. Le cabe a cada uno descubrir ese potencial y contribuir de forma única y particular a la construcción de esa gran tela, manifestación innegable de ese todo del cual todos hacemos parte. Tan sólo innovando el hombre progresa.

Cada vez más, a la hora de solucionar los problemas en el mundo, los gobiernos se convierten en instrumentos ineficaces. Las ONGs surgen como la necesidad de solucionar estos problemas de forma rápida y eficaz, y aun más importante, sin intermediarios. Las ONGs, como organizaciones privadas que intentan solucionar problemas bajo el mando y el esfuerzo de civiles, son un reflejo evidente de la falta de compromiso de los gobiernos en el ámbito de la cooperación internacional. Aunque vivamos en un mundo totalmente globalizado, solamente el 20% de las personas en el planeta hacen parte de él. Las demás 80% son consideradas totalmente irrelevantes. Solemos pensar que la democracia se basa en el derecho que tenemos a votar y a eligir un partido que nos represente. Sin embargo, la verdadera democracia va mucho más allá que la simple elección de un representante, abarcando también la posibilidad que tenemos de participar en las decisiones que toman nuestros gobiernos. No obstante, esto no es lo que sucede en nuestro mundo. El derecho de participación que tenemos como ciudadanos es muy limitado y según las estadísticas la mayoría de la población no se siente bien representada por su gobierno. Es urgente que repensemos nuestros modelos políticos y sociales aventurándonos a construir nuevas formas de gestionar nuestra sociedad y rompiendo con los anticuados modelos que conocemos y que ya no se adecuan al siglo en que vivimos. La democracia social es un modelo de futuro y según cual todos tenemos el poder de cambiar el mundo en que vivimos.
Indie, el nuevo miembro de nuestra familia
Published October 6, 2009 Uncategorized Leave a CommentTags: Adopción

Este es Indie, el nuevo miembro de nuestra familia. Tiene 3 años, es un Podenco Andaluz y lo hemos encontrado en una perrera en Barcelona. Desde algunos meses que hablábamos sobre tener un perro juntos. Después de informarnos sobre el tema, la decisión de adoptar nos pareció la mas lógica. En el año de 2008 109.000 perros fueran abandonados en España. La mayoría no volverá a encontrar un nuevo hogar. El maltrato y el abandono de animales siguen siendo un grave problema en nuestro país. La brutalidad y indiferencia con la que tratamos a los animales son un reflejo evidente de lo mucho que todavía debemos evolucionar como sociedad. Y aunque yo no sea el ejemplo ideal para hablar sobre los derechos de los animales (ya que ayer por la noche comí un trozo de ternera) recomiendo a cualquier persona que esté pensando comprar un perro, que primero se pase por una perrera. La primera cosa que me ocurrió al visitar la perrera fue: mira, cuantos perros bonitos! Desafortunadamente y de manera triste he sido llevado a creer que en una perrera solo habían perros feos y callejeros. Estaba muy equivocado! En un perrera encontramos todos los tipos de perros posibles y imaginables. La mayoría ya tiene más de 1 año, pero seguramente nos darán mucho más amor y cariño que un perro que compramos desde cachorro. Los perros son animales inteligentísimos y al pasar meses y meses dentro de una jaula en condiciones asquerosas, se vuelven extremamente agradecidos al ser acogidos en un hogar. Otra cosa que es importante tener en cuenta a la hora de comprar un perro es que las criadoras de perros producen mas perros de los que van a vender. A los perros que no han sido comprados les espera el abandono y posiblemente la muerte. Es importante que seamos responsables y que evitemos contribuir para la subsistencia de esta industria cuando existen millares de perros abandonados y que buscan desesperadamente un hogar. Desafortunadamente la mayoría de las perreras en España tiene una capacidad limitada para acoger perros y la mayoría acaba por ser sacrificada. Estamos los dos muy felices por haber encontrado a Indie y le daremos todo el amor y conforto del mundo. Os dejos las web de dos perreras en Barcelona por si os animáis a pasar:
http://www.protectorabcn.com/
http://www.upag-animal.org/cat/index.html
To Be The Experiencer Not The Experience
Published September 23, 2009 Experience , Human Being , Spirituality Leave a Comment
All of us are a result of what we have experienced. We are a result of what we have learned and assimilated from the outside world. Our beliefs, our behaviors and way of being are based on what we have seen, felt and experienced from the moment we began to shape our consciousness. In this sense, our thinking is limited by what we know, or rather, what we think we know. But how many of us have really stopped and looked beyond everything that we believe to be? How many of us have been able to overcome the ideological walls that we have built around us so that we come to define ourselves in the vast field that the humane experience is? Imagine for a moment that the human experience is a map. A map full of endless possibilities that we can experience with no limits. The essence of the human being is this map, this ALL through which we can experience each of these possibilities. However, so that we are able to experience ourselves as an individualization of this ALL, we need coordinates, or in other words, benchmarks. It is through these points that we will then be able to build our personality and everything else that we know about the world. Without these coordinates we would just lose ourselves in the vast agglomerate that the ALL is. In order to know our real essence, who we really are, we need to free ourselves from all the ‘sociocultural’ impositions and conditions that we have assimilated over the years and wrongly mistook for who we really are. There comes a time in the lives of many in which one ceases to be a set of experiences and becomes the person who simple experiences. It is only when one can experience without becoming the experience that one really starts to appreciate life and is able to know himself.

From all human imperfections selfishness is probably the hardest to eradicate. The reason for this is that selfishness derives from the influence that matter has over man and this, consequently, impedes him of appreciating the abundance that there is in life. But as morality starts to predominate over matter, selfishness begins to vanish. If we look carefully at the world around us we will easily conclude that selfishness is the root of all evils in the world. If we wish to cure these evils we must direct all of our efforts into destroying their cause. And we do that by starting with ourselves. By working everyday to be a little less selfish, by giving a bit more of ourselves to others than we did yesterday. Every man has an inherent desire to be happy. All of us strive to improve our position in this planet and we constantly try to eliminate whatever it is that is making us unhappy. As we grow in intelligence we start seeing that selfishness is one of those things. It is selfishness what makes us not share what we have with others, what makes us not forgive, what creates hate, jealousy, greed and ambition. It is selfishness what damages our social relations, creating conflict and destroying trust, making us behave in a defensive manner. But the more we evolve, the more we understand that this behaviour is incompatible with happiness. The more that we suffer due to the causes of selfishness, the more we realize how important it is to fight it. I have been incredible selfish throughout my life. I am nowhere near to defining myself as an unselfish person. But I’m on my way there.
Altruism As The Recognition Of The Right To Happiness
Published September 18, 2009 Altruism , Love Leave a Comment
Luke 18:15:17 – “I tell you the truth, anyone who will not receive the kingdom of God like a little child will never enter it.”
More and more I realize that even though parents are reproductively ready to have children from a young age, that doesn’t mean that they are ready to educate them. Ask any person who is 30 or 40 years old and I assure you that they are still in the process of defining and discovering themselves. It is my belief that the people who are better equipped to educate children in our society is another group that has been immensely discredit – the elderly.
In ancient societies the elderly played a vital role. They were venerated for their wisdom and maturity and most political and social decisions were influenced by them. Nowadays most elder people are left out and ignored and we worship youth and newness obsessively. It is obvious that our grandparents, through their maturity and experience, have a larger perspective of life than we do. We can learn a great lot just by talking to them. I am a firm believer that instead of being pushed into inactivity, the elderly should play a significant role in the education of our children. Most parents behold their children as property, but I do tell you that children belong to the entire humanity. Children represent our future and how parents teach their children should not be solely confined to their decision.
A lot has been said and written about children throughout history. They are the keepers of the greatest lesson that most of us adults strive to achieve – innocence! When a child looks at another child, he or she does not care if the other child is black or white. Children do not care what your religion is or if you’re gay or straight. Their thinking is free of judgment, free of addiction, free of remorse. They devote themselves entirely to the present moment. If all humans beings were like that, life in our planet would be very different.
I leave you a very sweet video I found this morning:

How can we ever understand truth unless we ourselves embody truth? In that sense isn’t truth the simple realization of our being in the present moment? We keep on looking for truth outside of ourselves when it is on the inside that we will find it. Therefore truth can never be revealed to us by other people. It is only through our own realization in the present moment that we will begin to grasp it. Truth is unique, undividable, untransferable, intimate, and it can only proceed from our own individual selves. Its unveiling only comes to being when we stop searching for it and we simple became aware of it. In the search for something we become lost in the ideal, the goal, the need to find out, the process itself. It is only through being consciously aware that we truly begin to see the reality of things.

It is often said that in a world with no laws, a world free of penalizations and obligations, chaos would emerge. People are so used to following guidelines and rules that they have forgotten that their true essence, which is freedom, can only come to being in a world where there are no barriers. By limiting man, by telling him what to do and what not to do, we also limit his mind and intelligence. Most people believe that the absence of laws would produce an increase of problems such as violence, corruption and murder. According to this thinking these problems would eventually become the rule in our world. But by saying this we are clearly forgetting that every man possesses within himself a higher intelligence and creative mind, which can’t express itself completely unless it inhabits a boundless world. I believe that every man is well capable of doing good and that by freeing man from his self-made walls he will be well capable of asserting what is beneficent not only for himself but also for those around him. Call me an optimistic, even idealist, but my belief is that a free mind is more suited for constructing a peaceful environment than an encaged one. The great illusion perpetuated by the rule system in which we live in is that the free man is a beast incapable of progressing unless he grows under the system. We have grown so accustomed to being told what to do and what not to do that we have clearly forgotten that each man, has within himself, the bases of asserting righteousness without the need of any kind of control system.

All of us are actors in a stage. And as we make our entrance into the stage, we know that sooner or later we will also have to exit it. In this sense life is but a performance. Shouldn’t we then perfect our craft and make the most of it while we are in the limelight? And just like the actor who finishes his performance and exits the stage doesn’t cease to exist, so does man exits his physical life and returns to being himself. All of us have arrived to this life with a wonderful gift. The gift of living. To share this gift with others by giving a part of ourselves to them is to retribute a blessing that was given to us for free. He who is all loving and kind has breathe upon us and gave each and every one of us a part of all that He himself is. A miracle has been bestowed upon us and for that reason the genuine prayer is not the one who asks for, but the one who thanks for – the one who thanks for everything that he has, for being a part of this wonderful journey with all its goods and its bads, its highs and its lows. As we know love and happiness, so will we know hate and pain. This way we will never be forgetful of the precious gift that we possess, a gift that needs to be maintained and taken care of. Only by sharing the gift of life with others will we truly repay Him for His love and kindness. To share is to love.

Recently someone asked me if I believe in God. Evidently my answer was ‘yes’, even though, I do not like to use the word ‘believe’ when talking about such an intrinsic part of my being. It’s not so much that I choose to believe in God, but I am a part of God and I experiment myself as such everyday. To prove or to reveal the existence of God is as difficult as proving and revealing the existence of a drop of water while submerged in the ocean. God is everywhere. He is in the clouds, in the air that I breathe, in my thoughts, in the orange juice that I drink every morning. God doesn’t have a beginning nor does He have an end, therefore, to define God and say that He is here or there is impossible, since He is everywhere. God simply is! The only way of knowing that He exists is through ‘being’. Therefore one does not have to look for God outside of himself; one simply needs to ‘be’ in order to feel His existence. To be who one really is.
It seems to me that the way each one of us sees the world as a lot to do with the extension of our thought. Let’s think of a tree for instance. Some see a tree as a simple object serving a purely aesthetic purpose in their existence. Others, when looking at the same tree, see a casualty of the laws of nature; a gigantic group of molecules miraculously rearranged to produce what we call Life. Others look even more further and when looking at the same tree see an entire ecosystem, an universe made of thousands of others universes – thousands of life forms co-existing together and vital to our own material existence. Others see something wonderful, something beautiful, a masterpiece of nature where a higher intelligence is reflected and reveals Its expression. Regardless of how each person looks at the tree, the tree remains the same as before – a tree! The same applies in the case of God. The question is – how much do we allow our thought to expand?
When we truly feel our existence to 100%, when we feel life flowing through our veins, when we liberate ourselves from the labels and categories created by our mind, when we simply feel and look at what is happening through ourselves, we feel a part of the whole and inevitably understand that the essence that we are, is the same essence that others are and that fulfils everything that exists in the Universe. That essence is God.

I am a man with a mission and a past to outdo,
I don’t need a gun I’ve got a focused mind and a clear heart to pull through,
Just like the earth has spent a thousand years making up for what we do,
So have I for you.
Your seeds of misery have sprouted and they try to block my way,
The worst gets the better of you and you try to disarm me with an embrace,
Just like the heart that’s spent a lifetime forgiving what is cruel,
So have I for you.
I have justified every wave in our ocean,
I have covered every range of emotion,
And just like the sea has spent an eternity at the mercy of the moon,
So have I for you.

What if we could look at our whole life of relationships as a grand hotel that we keep coming back to just because we like to spend some time there? Each time we go back, we try a different beautiful room for a different amount of time, knowing that there will always be more rooms that we can share with different people, and that each time we do so, we will be gifted with a different wonderful experience. Let’s imagine how peaceful it would feel if we could fully accept the reality that we will ALL have a number of relationships – and probably several kinds of them – over our lifetime. What if we didn’t have to be in agony just because one of our relationships didn’t give us everything we wanted or because it came to an end? What if we knew that the endings weren’t failures, but beautiful steps along the path? What if we could be grateful not only in the beginning of our relationships, but also in the middle and at the end? What if we didn’t have to hate one another just because the relationship ended? What if we could quietly and graciously comprehend that we spent exactly the amount of time we were supposed to spend – and now it is time to move on?

True wealth only becomes relevant when one starts being generous. What is the use of money if we only use it to beneficiate ourselves? Isn’t the money we gather useless in a world were every man comprehends his own eternity? Aware of his own divinity isn’t man’s existence far more profound than the material things that he is capable of gathering? Our value as a human species cannot be found in any of the things that we tend to surround ourselves with in our modern society. Only those who truly look within themselves and who make an effort to release themselves from the chains of materialism begin to grasp their true essence. It’s due to this kind of material imprisonment that our vision is blurred. We must fight then to conquer ourselves everyday, not by working to satisfy our hunger for more irrelevant things, but by making an effort to surpass that hunger and look at it from a higher point of view. We will then see that the true function of wealth is not to provide us with more insignificant things, but to allow us to transform the world around us more significantly. In our world money is a powerful mean that allows us to improve not only our lives but also the lives of others. Therefore the question in our head should be how would we use our money if we were rich and why aren’t we doing these things already with the limited money that we have?

All of us have an interior image of ourselves, an image that frequently does not correspond to reality. That image of ourselves is who we aspire to be. When our actions and way of living does not match that interior image that we have of ourselves we might feel discontent. It is as if we have forgotten who we were. A gradual desire to find ourselves once again starts to silently arise within our hearts. We feel lost, confused, we don’t know what to do. All we have is a feeling. A certain feeling of numbness. It is then that we decide to embark on a journey of self-discovery and we make a conscious effort to re-define who we are once again. But unless we breakaway from old forms and mental walls to exclude pain from our lives, we won’t be able to find peace again. Only by freeing ourselves from self-made limitations can we truly experiment happiness. One overcomes pain not by running away from it, but by confronting it. And for him who is one with himself, the universe becomes a mirror. Our self-image, when held with faith and strength, essentially defines the circumstances that we experiment in our lives. So it is vital that each one of us asks himself periodically, ‘am I being myself right now?’ As we see ourselves, so do we become.

You don’t need to be a genius to realize that money and success are NOT the keys to happiness, even though these two things can help you a lot if you only know how to use them. Some people only learn that lesson when they become tremendously rich or successful. Others don’t need to go that far. In my case, I have always lived a privileged life and I always had whatever I could possibly wish for. I finished my degree in TV Production and I have been working in the industry for the past 3 years. Even though my job is quite entertaining I don’t feel complete. I can’t imagine doing this for the rest of my life. When I think about my future there are certain things that I know that I want. I know that I want to live somewhere simple. I know that I want to do something that can improve other people’s live. I know that I want to have time for myself and for others. I want to enjoy life and I want to contribute for a better world. I want my job to be a reflection of who I am. Lately my discontentment has started to increase. I can feel the clock ticking once again inside of me and telling me that it’s time to go. I’m only 25 years old and I have lived in Portugal, England, China and now I found myself in Spain. I know the next step will probably be India or Africa. Contrary to other times in the past where I moved countries thinking of myself, I want my next move to be relevant, I want to do it right this time. What can I bring with myself that can really change people’s lives? Apart from my will and being able to teach English, I can’t think of much more. That’s why I have decided to enrol in university again. This time to complete a degree in Social Work, hoping to acquire the relevant knowledge to help people. It will take me 3 years and I will obviously have to maintain my present job while I do so. Even though I just feel like moving right now I need to think carefully and I need to balance things. What are 3 years compared to a life of helping people? My dream would be to create an NGO and thankfully God has put someone next to me who has exactly the same aspirations. We both want to dedicate our lives to others and what better gift than having a partner in such a wonderful adventure…
“We don’t take our forces and go around the world and try to take other people’s real estate or other people’s resources, their oil. That’s just not what the United States does. We never have, and we never will. That’s not how democracies behave.” (Donald Rumsfeld)

Most people in our society seem to believe that there is a war going on in Iraq. We hear the word ‘war’ so often through the media that we don’t take the time to consider what it actually means. According to the dictionary a war is ‘a state of usually open and declared armed hostile conflict between states or nations.’ This, however, is not the case, since Iraq nor any other Middle Eastern country declared war against the United States. Can we still use the word war then if we are referring to a one-way attack? The answer is no! There is another word in the dictionary which defines this behaviour perfectly. That word is invasion: ‘the act of invading; especially, the incursion of an army for conquest or plunder. But what is there to plunder in Iraq? The answer to this question is obvious. Oil!
According to the US Energy Information Administration (EIA), Iraq holds more than 112 billion barrels of oil and it has the world’s second largest proven oil reserves. If explored adequately Iraq could well rival Saudi Arabia and produce 6 million barrels a day, if not more. However, despite the invasion, and due to the sabotage of pipelines and pumping stations, the United States didn’t manage to convert Iraq into an open economy fuelled by a thriving oil sector. Yet.
As George Bush’s presidency came to an end new strategies started to take shape. First you invade a country and take military control over it, then you start dialoguing and you use diplomacy to achieve your purpose. And what better way to soften the damage provoked to the Middle East and clean America’s image then to elect a president willing to talk and to promote “peace”? A president who coincidentally is sympathetic towards the Muslim culture. And the best part is that it was the American people who elected this great president. At least that’s what THEY would like them to think.
Obama has recently started his diplomatic parade through the Middle East. One of the key points of his visit was Saudi Arabia, another country hugely interested in Iraq’s oil. And this is what Obama had to say during a speech last Wednesday while visiting the country: ”I am confident that the the United States and Saudi Arabia can make progress on a whole host of issues of mutual interest.” The interest, evidently, is the exploitation of Iraq’s oil.
George Bush decided to invade Iraq in April 2001, six months before September 11th, and the official reason was to improve Western access to Iraqi oil. The decision for military action had nothing to do with 9/11, the war on terrorism, the UN weapons inspections, weapons of mass destruction, Iraqi human rights, or any of the factors that the US government would like you to believe are the true motives for war. Whoever thinks that Barack Obama wasn’t elected intentionally is blind to the evidence. Just a month ago Obama’s administration was asking Congress for another $83.4 billion to fund the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Wasn’t the war, or must I say invasion, supposed to end soon? According to anti-war Democratic Representative Lynn Woolsey this new funding will do two things: it will prolong America’s occupation of Iraq through at least the end of 2011, and it will deepen and expand its military presence in Afghanistan indefinitely!”
Instead of attempting to find military solutions to the problems in Iraq and Afghanistan, President Obama should fundamentally change the mission in both countries to focus on promoting reconciliation, economic development, humanitarian aid, and regional diplomatic efforts. It seems that that isn’t happening anytime soon.

I find myself in complete disgust when I think about our current police system. In my view, the existence of a body of this nature is a clear demonstration that we are not free. In a world where words such as ‘freedom’ and ‘democracy’ are thrown around superficially, a police system such as ours seems to me in complete contradiction with the values that we so often try to promote. How can we ever be free while such an authoritarian corp exists?
More and more I realize that the idea of a police who cares about the people and who exists to protect them is but a monstrous chimera! Here in Spain the situation is quite extreme. We have a disgraceful, unapologetic, disrespectful and brute police system functioning in an openly corporative way. How can a supposedly governmental institution, financed by the tax payers’ money, work as if it was a private corporation? For me it’s absolutely illogical and I’m surprised that people haven’t manifested against such a maquiavelic scheme.
In this country, as in most parts of the world I assume, the police has annual financial targets. In case you’ve ever wondered, this is the reason why in December the streets are full of policemen trying to fine you for every single minor offence. After all, the end of the year is approaching and there is a financial target to accomplish. Furthermore, there is always a sense of insolency when one of these ogres approaches you. There is a despotic feeling in the air and you are treated as if you were a dangerous criminal, independently of the degree of the offence you have just committed. But, isn’t the police supposed to help us? Why is there fear then? Aren’t these guys supposed to protect us, help us and make our lives a little bit easier?
I’ve attached a video bellow which clearly demonstrates my point. A group of students manifesting against a recent European reform, which attempts to harmonise the university qualifications amongst the different countries of the EU, are severely attacked by the police. One of the main objections of the students is the introduction of a self-financing educational system. Under the reforms, a degree will takes less time to complete but if a student desires to specialise in a particular subject, he or she will now have to do a Master’s degree which will cost an additional €1800 per year, obviously not subsidized by the government. The students want scholarships and not loans. Another concern of the students is that they now have to undergo an unremunerated 6 months work-training program with a company before starting work. The students believe that an university degree is for the benefit of the society and not for businesses. This is how the police handled the situation:
Same Sex Marriage
Published May 28, 2009 Gender , Love , Same Sex Marriage , Spirituality 5 Comments
Only in a primitive world such as ours, where man still perceives himself as a mere body, does man asks himself if a marriage between two people of the same sex should be allowed. For the spirit there is no such thing as gender. Gender is simply a temporal condition derived from our embodiment of a physical body. And for the foolish man who in his words predicates the existence of the spirit, but who in his actions denies it, an elementary misconception is revealed. That of jumbling the attributes of the object with those of the creator, or in other words, the attributes of the physical body with those of the spirit; plainly forgetting that the nature of the second is never confined to the nature of the first. It is the spirit who gives life to the body. Not the other way around. And even though we temporarily inhabit bodies that have a gender, in essence our spirit remains genderless. If for a moment we were capable of liberating ourselves from the confinements of the body, we would realise that this is simply a question of love! It’s not about a man and a man, or a woman and a woman. It’s about two spirits who love each other and wish for their love to be recognized by those around them. Who are we to dictate the nature of love and what it should be about? Confronted with love aren’t all of us defenseless? Love knows no gender, thence, only in a world where the spirit of man is caged away from its true essence, does man aimlessly attempts to circumscribe it.

I constantly meet people who have the urge to do something positive with their lives, but usually just don’t know what to do. If you are one of the people who would like to contribute for a better society, all you really need is two hours a week and a lot of patience. Volunteer work is one of the best ways to help others and there are many ways through which you can contribute. You can volunteer at hospitals, food banks, shelters for the homeless, retirement houses, etc. In Barcelona where I live there are many associations for the elder constantly looking for volunteers to help them. I personally work with Amics De La Gent Grand and my responsibility is to visit an elder couple at their home and give them support. It’s basically like visiting your grandparents every weekend! It’s quite fun as well. Anyway, they are always on the look for new volunteers and I definitely recommend it to anyone who wants to contribute for a better world. I leave you a video for you to have an idea of the type of work that we do:
http://www.amicsdelagentgran.org/
And this is a beautiful poem that my friend Janice sent me the other day and that she found at her aunt Jean’s retirement home:
To Our Dear Child
On the day you see us old, weak, weary
Have patience & try understand us
If we get dirty when eating
And if we cannot dress on our own
Please bear with us & remember the times
We spent feeding you & dressing you up
If when we speak to you, we repeat the same thing
Over & over again, do not interrupt us; listen to us
When you were little, we had to read you the same story
A thousand & one times until you went to sleep
When we do not want to have a shower,
Neither shame us nor scold us
Remember when we had to chase you
With your thousand excuses to get you to the shower
When at times we lose the memory
Or the thread of our conversation
Let us have the necessary time to remember
As the most important thing is not our conversation
But simply being with you & have you listening to us
Lend us your helping hand the same way we did
When you tried your first faltering steps
And when someday we say to you
That we don’t want to live anymore, do not get angry
Try to appreciate that our age is not just lived, but survived
You must not feel sad, angry or ashamed
For having us near you
Instead, try understand us & help us
Like we did when you were young
Some day, you will realise that despite our mistakes
We always wanted the best for you
Help us walk, help us live
The rest of our lives with love & dignity
We will pay you with a smile & the immense love
We have always had for you in our heart

No one deserves to feel pain, even though, many times, the pain that we feel is self inflicted. Always the heart-broken one, I was never the heartbreaker. That is, until today. The lesson you learn in both cases is completely different. In order to fully appreciate the lesson that being the second teaches you, it is essential that you go through being the first. Only a heartbreaker who’s been through a heartbreak himself can fully comprehend the powerful force that his decision will generate. “Though love” (in the words of my good friend Janice) is never an easy thing.
One thing is to be the recipient of pain; there is always someone to blame, some external cause to point your finger at, even though, as I have previously written, it is our attachment to something or someone what ultimately makes us feel pain. However, to be the cause of pain and to damage someone else’s heart, is a far more complex subject to understand. When you look at things from an external point of view, in this case from the heartbreaker’s perspective, it becomes clear that a heartbreak can only be comparable to a blessing. A heartbreak pushes you out of your comfort zone and makes you stand by yourself. It makes you grow and ultimately abolishes all your self-created limitations. It is almost as if someone had suddenly pushed you into a black hole and you were there, all alone by yourself, eventually realizing that the darkness surrounding you was but light; a light too bright for you initially to see. And it is upon this light that you will then find the strength to carry on, building new illusionary boundaries that will eventually also be destroyed. And this process keeps on repeating like a cycle until you finally learn the lesson – that you belong to that light! That you belong to a boundless life where you can experiment and enjoy people, objects, and circumstances withou being attached to them.
Until you learn that you truly are a free being who doesn’t need anyone or anything to feel complete – or in other words that you are already complete!- Life will keep on pushing you back into that black hole. As the Jewish proverb goes, ‘God is closest to those with broken hearts’. We should therefore embrace the heartbreak and let it heal us and take us where we ought to be.

Since a young age I have always had a special interest for science. In fact, science and spirituality never seemed incompatible to me. Science helps us to deepen our knowledge about the universe, and that, consequently, helps us to understand why we are the way we are and more importantly “why” we are here. I recently read some of the work done by Hermann Minkowsi, a German mathematician whose work on Einstein’s theory of relativity is remarkable.
Einstein’s main discovery is that the speed of light is absolute, ie it is the same for all observers. His studies indicate that time and space are relative and not absolute as it was thought. In fact, both space and time depend on the speed of the observer. The theory of relativity essentially says that time will pass more slowly for an observer who is moving relatively to an observer who isn’t. Einstein created a paradox to illustrate the practical consequences of his finding:
Twin brothers. One stays on Earth while the other travels to the moon at a tremendously high speed. While for the twin who travelled 5 years have passed (for example), for the twin who stayed on Earth a lot more time has passed – let’s say 50 years. This happens because relatively to someone who isn’t moving, time passes more slowly to someone who is. Hypothetically, if the twin who travelled could surpass the speed of light he could go to the moon and back and even see himself before taking off.
Hermann Minkowski explored the ideas of Einstein and illustrated space and time as a figure that he called light cone. This cone illustrates an isolated event that occurs in an isolated point of space-time. From that event, if you move your eyes upwards through the cone, you will see all the future consequences of that event. If you move your eyes downwards, you’ll see all the past events that may have influenced that same event. Other cones would be above and below the cone and symbolize other events happening simultaneously in other points of space-time.
I write about this to explain that the events referred to by Hermann are only forms of energy – our thoughts, our words and our actions have, evidently, an impact on the space-time around us, even though most of us are not aware of it. We are changing the world continuously. From our perspective it seems that space and time are moving, but it is we who actually move through space and time. Having this in mind we are forced to accept that nothing is permanent and that everything depends on ourselves – what we think, what we say and what we do.
We can change the future today if we wish to do so. What are we waiting for?

Why do some people insist in believing in “miracles” in order to validate their irrational points of views? Why do they have to resist science and be an obstacle to progress? Isn’t life and nature mind-blowing enough? Why is it necessary to create unrealistic stories in order to sustain unfactual beliefs? And why would Life (or Nature, or God, or whatever you prefer to call it ) go against itself, the laws and the universe it created, in order to perform a miracle? Surely there are things that happen in the world which we can’t explain. However, these reveals to us that our knowledge is limited when it comes to explaining certain things, rather than a “miracle”. Just the word miracle is completely contradictory, because if something happens in the universe, then there must be a rational explanation for it. The fact that something is inexplicable to us doesn’t mean that it isn’t subject to certain laws; it simply means that we are not aware of those laws. Why do some people find comfort in believing in a virgin who gave birth to a child, or a talking snake, or even a man who rose from the death? Isn’t the “miracle” of life and man himself spectacular enough? After all, if we think about it, we are matter that through time and evolution became conscious of itself. Matter with consciousness! How incredible is that? Through us, life somehow managed to become aware of itself and to know itself. Each one of us is therefore the embodiment of nature knowing itself. To add to this spectacle we are now finding that we can affect and decide how we evolve – nature is now able to decide how it evolves! Through us nature is now a person and it has a will! If all of this doesn’t leave you stunned enough, and you find it more fascinating to believe in a man who watches you all the time and condemns you if you don’t act the way he wants, then you haven’t got a clue! It’s time to grow and allow humanity to progress.

As science advances with time, the need to venture through unthinkable and unexpected territories becomes necessary to humanity’s progress. Innovation is always the result of an obstinated mind who is willing to take risks and think out of the box, despite the adversity it might find. I recently came into contact with one of these innovative ways of thinking while reading about development biology, which is the study of the process by which organisms grow and develop. The mind pushing it forward is Rupert Sheldrake and the theory, known as ‘Morphogenetic Fields’, concerns the process that gives rise to tissues, organs and form in general.
According to this theory, a morphogenetic field is essentially a non-physical blueprint that gives origin to a physical form in particular. This non-physical field can be envisioned as an electromagnetic field present in space and time and imperceptible to human senses, which carries information and basically instructs cells how to gather and what form to create. Rupert Sheldrake, trained as a plant physiologist, became interested in the way that plants, and all living things, took on their form. What starts as a single cell splitting into identical copies eventually changes, with some cells taking on specific characteristics, some become leaves, some stem. Once these changes have taken place, the reverse is no longer possible, leaves cannot be changed back into stems. We know nowadays that DNA doesn’t carry all the information necessary to shape the form of a living system, so scientists suspect that there might be some kind of unknown element or mechanism responsible for this. Sheldrake developed a theory to explain this problem, one based on a universal field encoding the “basic pattern” of an object. In Sheldrake’s view, the existence of a form is itself sufficient to make it easier for that form to come to existence somewhere else. In this view, nature may be a set of habits and not of laws, as we usually tend to think. As Sheldrake wrote:
“The idea is that there is a kind of memory in nature. Each kind of thing has a collective memory. So, take a squirrel living in New York now. That squirrel is being influenced by all past squirrels. And how that influence moves across time, the collective squirrel-memory both for form and for instincts, is given by the process I call morphic resonance. It’s a theory of collective memory throughout nature. What the memory is expressed through are the morphic fields, the fields within and around each organism. Basically, morphic fields are fields of habit, and they’ve been set up through habits of thought, through habits of activity, and through habits of speech. Most of our culture is habitual, I mean, most of our personal life, and most of our cultural life is habitual. The whole idea of morphic resonance is evolutionary, but morphic resonance only gives the repetitions. It doesn’t give the creativity. So evolution must involve an interplay of creativity and repetition.”
Moreover, these same concepts can be used to explain some of the mysteries about human memory. In effect, our brains are not so much libraries as they are sending and receiving stations that leave a continuous trail of experience imprinted in morphogenetic fields and then “recall” previous experiences by tuning in to that trail. Another implication of this theory is that it suggests that our identity is in fact dual, just like an electron that is both a particle and a wave. We have aspects that are unique and totally individual, yet at the same time much of our thought and behaviour is shaped by, and participates in, and helps create transpersonal morphogenetic fields. In this sense we are both individuals and expressions/creators of a group mind. Because our brains contain levels (mammalian, reptilian, etc.) that connect us to other species, that group mind includes all life. We may even find, as we explore the possibilities of consciousness associated with what we know think of as non-living matter, that we are linked in consciousness to all creation. Considering the idea of morphogenetic fields opens the door to the scientific investigation of the idea that consciousness and mental processes can function without physical support.
I later came to think that we can connect this theory to David Bohm’s quantum physic theory, which basically says that there is an implicate order; a primary totality, which is indivisible and is not subject to the physical laws that we know. According to Bohm it’s from this unified implicate order that the diversified explicate order arises. In Bohm’s view, all the separate objects, entities, structures, and events in the visible or explicate world around us are relatively autonomous, stable, and temporary “subtotalities” derived from a deeper, implicate order of unbroken wholeness.

Most people I know see relationships as a mean to completion. They believe that once they find the “perfect partner” they will somehow feel whole and eternally happy. What people fail to understand is that there is no need to look for completion beyond oneself. Everything that we possibly need to feel complete exists within ourselves – be it love, attention, compassion, or kindness. By abolishing the illusion of need, we realise that everything we could possible need, is there abundantly, inside of our hearts. Instead of starting relationships thinking of what we are going to get, we start relationships thinking of what we are going to give. We stop looking for someone who can complete us and start looking for someone whom we can complete instead. We no longer look for someone who will make us happy; we look for someone whom we can make happy. When we do this we stop being attached to people and we stop creating expectations. When a relationship stops working, because we simply became different and drifted apart from our partners, we no longer feel a sense of loss or pain when we separate. Instead, we feel happy and understand deep down inside that what for most people looks like an ending, is but an open door to new experiences and to grow beyond our own limitations. We celebrate the end of our relationship and we welcome the future with open arms and excitement. Attachment will always be a source of suffering in the world. When we let go of it we start experiencing things more fully and we no longer worry if our relationships are going to work or not. That stops being our purpose. We simply live the moment and make the most of it by understanding that each relationship is an unique opportunity to learn something and to improve ourselves.
Relationships – Part I
Published May 18, 2009 Human Being , Love , Relationships , Spirituality 2 Comments
A romantic relationship is the arena where we truly work on ourselves. We let down our defences, we become vulnerable, and we let our beings be completely transformed and shaped by love. We feel happy, ecstatic, and can’t believe that this is happening to us. It is only after a while that we come to the realization that the source of our greatest happiness, is also the source of our greatest suffering. And this is not a result of love itself, for love is pure and grand, but simply a result of our attachment to it. Having said that, attachment is undoubtedly the greatest cause of suffering in the world. When we allow love to enter our lives without actually becoming attached to it, we rapidly realise that love is like a tide. It comes in and it goes out. Or at least that’s what it feels like from our human perspective. And when we understand that simple and apparent temporal condition of love, a love too magnificent to be locked in our tiny and fragile hearts, we accept its seasons naturally and without a fight. And now here comes the tricky part, and which I have recently found out through combining my scientific knowledge with my spiritual one; love doesn’t actually come in and out of our lives, even though it feels that way to us; it is we who move in and out of love! And just like the universe, engaged in a cycle of expansion and retraction, so does our heart enter and leave love, so that every time it does, we come to know ourselves better.
(To be continued…)

I was born,
I was born to be with You,
In this space and time,
After that and ever after I haven’t had a clue,
Only to break rhyme,
This foolishness can leave a heart black and blue,
And I know that only love,
Only love can leave such a mark,
I know that only love,
Only love can heal such a scar.
I was born,
I was born to sing for You,
I didn’t have a choice but to lift You up,
And sing whatever song You wanted me to,
I give you back my voice,
From the womb my first cry,
Such a joyful noise.
Only love,
Only love can leave such a mark,
But only love,
Only love can heal such a scar.

What does it truly mean that man is made in the image of God?
Just like God, all of us are creators. Creators of our own reality. Every thought, every word, every action has an influence on the universe around us. The question is: do we create our reality consciously or unconsciously?
When I look around me it’s clear that most people create their reality unconsciously, allowing their being to be a result of their surroundings, instead of making their surroundings be a result of their being. Most people I know live subordinated to external conditions and the will of the “system”. Everyone talks and is conscious that a change is needed in the world (we all eager for that change), but only very few make an effort to change themselves. But is it really worth talking about the injustices and poverty in the world (for instance), if we are not willing to change the way we live? What good is it that we know ourselves as compassionate, if we don’t put it into practice?
I often hear that an individual effort is useless in order to change the world and that that responsibility is of those who are in power and control our governments. But by saying this we are forgetting that each one of us has the power to change the world around us. Unless we are able to see ourselves as responsible for what happens in the world, the world will not change. It’s crucial for all of us to understand that what happens in the world is a simple reflection, or an amplification, of what happens in our daily lives. And until we change our daily lives, the life of the whole won’t change neither.
Thoughts. Words. Actions. All three are forms of creation. They occur continuously. They never stop, even when we are seemingly motionless. Every thought, every word, every action is creative. And each one of these three elements creates the reality around us. Every single moment is a brand new moment where we have the opportunity of re-creating ourselves and the world around us. We create the future together through our small steps, rather than through a single great moment or decision. And it’s to these small steps that we must pay attention to. Our daily thoughts, words and actions.
The future lies in the hands of each and everyone of us. How do we want the future to be like?

A revolution is silently arising in science. As we enter the 21st century, the old scientific ways of explaining the world gradually fall and are replaced by new ways that can explain it more rationally and according to the knowledge that we possess today. One of the fields where this transformation can be seen more clearly is modern biology. During the 20th century scientists though that there were only two basic elements in the universe – matter and energy. As we enter the 21st century scientists realize now that there is a third element which science didn’t take into account when explaining the world. That element is information!
During the past 150 years Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution has been widely accepted within the scientific community. However, with the latest scientific discoveries in the field of genetics there is currently a shift going on and more and more scientists conclude that the theory of evolution can’t explain what happens in the microscopic genetic world. It’s important to take into account that when Darwin formulated his theory, he thought that a cell was a simple organism, more or less in the image of an homogeneous globe. Nowadays we know that a cell is not simple at all. A cell is in fact the most complex system mankind has ever discovered. One single cell is an entire universe where billions of “activities” happen simultaneously and coordinately. In the words of W. H. Thorpe, “The most elementary type of cell constitutes a ‘mechanism’ unimaginably more complex than any machine yet thought up, let alone constructed, by man.” The theory of evolution is indeed great to explain genetic mutations that happen gradually and over time in species, but it becomes absolutely and irrevocably dissatisfying when trying to explain the origin of life itself and the “appearance” of the first cell. In his book Darwin addresses this question superficially and attributes the formation of the first single cell to random conditions and mutations that happened as he himself wrote “in some warm little pond”.
As we enter the 21st century we are forced to accept that the complexity of the microscopic world can’t be be attributed to casualty alone. We know nowadays that without DNA, amino acids wouldn’t even link and form proteins, which are the building blocks of a cell. It’s thanks to DNA that amino acids gather as they do and we are therefore able to perform simple daily tasks such as seeing, hearing, talking, feeling, etc. And what is DNA? DNA is a nucleic acid that contains the genetic instructions used in the development and functioning of all known living organisms and some viruses. Its main role is the storage of information. So this brings us to an important question – how did the genetic code, along with the mechanisms for its translation (ribosomes and RNA molecules), originate? If we look at it without any kind of prejudice we we will rapidly conclude that there is a complex and inherent design which is difficult to understand in the present day. It seems to me that in the course of our century we will observe the acceptance of Intelligent Design as the most plausible theory to explain the origin of life. Michael Denton, a famous Australian biologist writes in his book Evolution A Theory In Crisis (which I highly recommend to everyone interested in the subject):
“To the skeptic, the proposition that the genetic programmes of higher organisms, consisting of something close to a thousand million bits of information, equivalent to the sequence of letters in a small library of 1,000 volumes, containing in encoded form countless thousands of intricate algorithms controlling, specifying, and ordering the growth and development of billions and billions of cells into the form of a complex organism, were composed by a purely random process is simply an affront to reason. But to the Darwinist, the idea is accepted without a ripple of doubt – the paradigm takes precedence!”
NOTE: Unfortunately many ignorant people still talk about Intelligent Design as if they were talking about Creationism, which clearly denotes a tremendous lack of knowledge of both theories. The Intelligent Design Theory is not biblical creationism. There is an important distinction between the two positions. Biblical creationists begin with a conclusion that the biblical account of creation is reliable and correct, that life on Earth was designed by God. They then look for evidence from the natural realm to support this conclusion. Intelligent Design theorists begin with the natural realm and reach the conclusion that life on Earth was designed by an intelligent agent (whoever that might be). It can be formulated as a scientific theory having empirical consequences and devoid of religious commitments. It is in fact a theory of information. Within such a theory, information becomes a reliable indicator of design as well as a proper object for scientific investigation.

Recently I have been reading David Bohm’s work, an expert in quantum physics, and one of the most revolutionary thinkers of the 20th century. He was a colleague of Einstein in Princeton and made a number of significant contributions to physics, particularly in the area of quantum mechanics and relativity theory. He also proposed a cosmological order radically different from generally accepted conventions. According to his investigation, the physical world possesses a dynamic indivisible structure which is the cause of the enormous diversity of beings and phenomenons that we perceive through our senses. Paradoxically, this structure or system is continuously changing, while maintaining an internal subtract that sustains it and unifies it.
According to Bohm, all physical, biological and physic phenomenons that happen in the sensitive and perceptible reality, are a part of the explicate order. This is a temporal order, continuously changing and composed by the set of events which can be experimentally verified by any scientific discipline. “Behind” this explicate order subject to the laws of cause-effect and space-time, there is an implicate order; a primary totality, which is indivisible and is not subject to the physical laws that we know. It’s from this unified implicate order that the diversified explicate order arises. In Bohm’s view, all the separate objects, entities, structures, and events in the visible or explicate world around us are relatively autonomous, stable, and temporary “subtotalities” derived from a deeper, implicate order of unbroken wholeness. Bohm gives the analogy of a flowing stream. On this stream, one may see an ever-changing pattern of vortices, ripples, waves, splashes, etc., which evidently have no independent existence as such. Rather, they are abstracted from the flowing movement, arising and vanishing in the total process of the flow. Such transitory subsistence as may be possessed by these abstracted forms implies only a relative independence or autonomy of behaviour, rather than absolutely independent existence as ultimate substances.
Bohm believed that the general tendency for individuals, nations, races, social groups, etc., to see one another as fundamentally different and separate was a major source of conflict in the world. It was his hope that one day people would come to recognize the essential interrelatedness of all things and would join together to build a more holistic and harmonious world. If you like quantum physics I recommend that you read his book ‘Wholeness and The Implicate Order’ where he describes an enfolding-unfolding universe with consciousness playing a central role. He was definitely a great thinker ahead of his time. Check a video of him talking about fragmentation:
Being smart! Are you born with it? Or do you create it yourself as you go along? I frequently meet with people who lack interest in the things around them. All they seem to care about is fulfilling their immediate physical desires and when you ask them about current social or political issues going on in the world, most of them seem oblivious to them. There seems to be an inherent stupidity when I look around me, especially prominent in younger generations, and which I can’t fully comprehend. Are some people really born unintelligent, or do we all have the capability of instructing ourselves and growing in intellect? I always had great faith in mankind, but I really have a problem with people who refuse to use the grey matter they were born with. Mankind’s stupidity reveals itself at its best during a football match. And when you watch all those people around you growling, swearing and dribbling, you can’t help but notice the similarities between men and monkeys. And if you think that you’ve seen it al by then, just wait until the football match is over and all those people get in the streets and literally convert into angry gorillas. And that’s when you think to yourself: why don’t these people have the same motivation for things that really matter? Let’s all get angry for the injustices in the world! Let’s all growl and swear for the people who die of hunger and thirst everyday. Let’s all join forces and scream in the street like madmen to change this corrupt world that we live in. Let’s all fight against war! When did mankind settle for mediocrity? As Dr. David Suzuki brilliantly put it, ‘it’s like we’re in a giant car heading towards a brick wall and everyone’s arguing over where they’re going to sit.’ And since I’m writing about stupidity, how can a lot of supposedly educated people still throw garbage on the floor in the 21st century?!?!?! How imbecile do you need to be to do something like that, after all the information pumped into our brains about environmentalism?!?!? Current mood: perplexed!

In our day to day we are so busy working and running from one side to the other, that we often forget about the important things in life. We go worrying about things which have no importance at all and we waist our energy away without realizing and understanding that we live in a cage. Being a little extremist I would say that the only difference between us and ancient slaves is entertainment. We are slaves with televisions. And when we arrive home, after an exhausting and often inhumane day at work, we reach for the remote, turn the TV on, and forget about the reality of our own condition – that we live to work, and do not work to live. At the end of the day, entertainment serves its purpose, distracting us from the real problems in our lives and in a larger scale from the problems in the world. And so we finish our day without the energy to think.
When we are out of energy, we lose consciousness. And without consciousness there can’t be no comprehension of our true selves and the world around us. It’s a vicious cycle that perpetuates itself again and again, teasing us with a distant thought of happiness, which we never seem to achieve. True long lasting happiness derives from comprehension though. Comprehension of our own nature and a step towards responsibility. The problems that we see in the world exist because we allow them to exist. Hunger, poverty, violence, war; we create these problems ourselves starting with our own individual lives. But if we don’t have the time to think about these problems, how can we even begin to solve them?
If entertainment was to disappear from the face of the Earth, people would have the time to think about their lives, and I doubt that most of them would actually accept the system that we live in. The outside noise is so strong though, that we stopped paying attention to our hearts and intuition. Most of us have forgotten where we come from and where we are going. To wake-up and to change the world is a decision that all of us can take if we simply listen and follow our hearts. For behind its beating His voice sings loud and clear, always ready to guide us and take us where we ought to be. True change starts within ourselves.

Yesterday a friend of mine told me about the ideas of Thomas Hobbes (philosopher), who said that man is evil by nature. To further understand his way of thinking it is necessary to take into consideration that Thomas Hobbes lived in England in the sixteenth century and was a mechanistic materialist, who believed solely in the “body” and denied the existence of the soul. According to his work, man is a simple physical machine, who basically moves to achieve his inherent necessities through two processes which he named approach and departure.
The first thing that came to my mind when I heard my friend’s comments was; would Thomas Hobbes still think the same way if he was alive today? And the second is; are we really mere machines that simply react to our instincts and desires, or is there a will that transcends them and which reveals to us our true nature? To say that man is inherently good or bad is not only ignorant, but also takes away our sense of freedom and responsibility, attributing our actions to a nature that is somewhat remote. What defines good or bad often changes with time and obviously depends on the civilization or society that we live in, based mostly on the need that that society has to ensure its own survival than anything else. A few centuries ago, for instance, slavery was not considered bad. Nowadays, in certain African tribes incest isn’t as well. From my perspective we consider ‘good’ all things that unite us, make us happy, and which help us to progress. These are often the result of wrong considerations – sometimes we think that something unites and helps us to progress when in fact it does just the opposite, such is the case of slavery. The same way we consider ‘bad’ all things that separate us, make us unhappy, and which are an obstacle to our self-development. Having this in mind, what are good and evil if not abstract definitions that allow us to define ourselves in the vast field of thought? What are good and evil if not coordinates in the large map that human experience is?
The nature of man isn’t good, nor bad; the nature of man simply is, just as everything else in the universe. Good and evil are simple value judgements that we make and that have more to do with ourselves and our way of thinking than the observed object itself. On the other hand, if we are willing to deepen within ourselves, we will understand that good and bad are simply the two sides of a same coin. In fact, we wouldn’t know what good is if there was no evil, the same way that we don’t know what heat is in the absence of cold. We aren’t naturally good, nor naturally evil. It is clear that good and bad are in the eye of the beholder.
Good is always good, no matter the road that leads us to It!
As usual, this past Sunday I met with three friends for a coffee and chat a bit about life. It is always a pleasure to discuss with individuals this interesting and whenever we are together, time seems to fly by. While we were talking I realized that each one of us had been educated by the principles of a different religion – one as Jew, one as a Muslim, one as an Orthodox and me as a Catholic. And despite our differences, four of the major religions in the world sat around a small table that afternoon and coexisted with no problem at all. It was then that I thought that if we could do it, the world could do it too.
More and more I realize that the prosperity of our future won’t result from our ability to strengthen and reaffirm our own individual convictions, but from our ability to converge and unify them under one same system. It seems to me that the power of human intelligence is based precisely in that; in its capacity to connect, to relate, and to integrate different ideas and knowledge. We evolve because we unite, not because we separate. And something divine manifests itself when we are able to adapt and coexist with a way of being and thinking different from ours.
If there is a God, then He is is the force that unites all things – the visible and the invisible, the manifest and the unmanifest, the present with the past and the future, all the apparent contradictions with the truth, all the little fragments with the whole – until they all become one and that same one is much greater than the sum of its parts.
Unity is hence the key to human progress.

It is not only imperative, but also inevitable, that a new political and ideological system emerges over the course of the coming centuries. Today, more than ever, we are aware and responsible for the things around us and each one of us is gradually coming to the conclusion that if we truly wish to survive on this planet, we can’t keep on living as before. With all that is going on in the world, I believe that we are initiating the first stages of a new ideology and way of living. How fast or how slow it happens depends in reality on the individual efforts of each and everyone one of us. After meditating about it I came to the conclusion that certain “pillars” will be a vital part of this future ideological system. These are:
- All of us are one, regardless of our race, education, level of moral or intellectual progress, physical condition, sex, economic status… we are all part of the same thing. The spirit that lives in my heart is the same that lives in the hearts of others.
- The violation of basic human rights will not be permitted. Food, health and housing will be the birthright of every single human being. Nobody will have to go through the humiliation of poverty, hunger, unattended disease, regardless of their life circumstances.
- The individual freedom and uniqueness of every individual will be celebrated, explored and encouraged. To achieve this, education will play a significant role, so that all children can develop their vocation through appropriate school subjects. Classical education as we know it today will be replaced by a modern and progressive education, which will have its emphasis on the individual needs and abilities of each child.
- Nature will be restored and preserved. Each animal will be protected and taken care of and every person will be taught that they too have the same right to live on this planet than we do.
- Private property as we know it will be abolished – since our basic rights (food, health, housing) will be answered – and we won’t feel the need to guard our possessions as we do today. People will share willingly and happily with the rest of the world.
- All planetary resources will be shared by humanity, and ultimately we will cease to have countries and geographical divisions. Instead, we will have some form of universal government consisting of representatives of each nation who will ensure order and the individual freedom of each person.
- Violence will never be used as a response or to achieve our goals, both individually and collectively.
It is my belief that these pillars are the basis of the ideology that will emerge in the coming centuries. Some faster than others, but all vital to a healthy and balanced development of mankind.

The belief in the spiritual world has existed since the beginning of time. We can find it in all moments in history, in every single part of the planet. All of us, deep down inside, carry the intuition that our true nature is not material and that we are more than our bodies. We are instinctively aware that our true nature is spiritual; that there is an invisible world around us, which can’t be perceived through our physical senses. Some people interpret this instinct through their ignorance and prejudice often generating superstitious beliefs. Others, not being able to envision this spiritual world and capturing a part of it in a jar, simply decide to deny it and attribute it to to imagination. Either way, explained or unexplained, the intuition is there and that can’t be denied.
Two main doctrines can be seen in the world nowadays. One which denies the future, while the other proclaims and proves the existence of the future. One which doesn’t explain anything at all, while the other explains it all. One that generates more selfishness, while the other generates ground for justice, love, and charity. The first one only explains the present and destroys all hope, while the second one cures the heart and reveals the vast field of the future. Which one is the most useful and important?
I often hear people saying that they wish to create a better future. Nevertheless, the systematic and unreasoned disbelief that I constantly see around me is an obstacle to that future. The cause of this unwarranted incredulity, which is often symptomatic of the non-believers’ lack of study and interest about their own beliefs, is the same that leads to religious fanaticism, blinding many men and blocking their reason. Many people I know don’t believe in the spiritual world, not because they have a valid reason to do so, but simply because they make a value judgment about the subject and decide not to think about it too much. The logic is this: “If I can’t see it, it doesn’t exist!” But can a simple opinion have the same importance and validity as a well-founded conclusion? And isn’t the insistence of the Church on spreading false dogmas which contradict all scientific knowledge, what leads many individuals to reject the interest for spiritual matters? Isn’t religion, as we know it today, the great demolisher of its own system?
The progress of humanity has its basis in the enforcement of justice, love and charity; laws which are founded on the certainty of the future. And from these laws, all others derive, for they contain all conditions through which men can be happy. Spiritualism gives us the certainty of the future and encourages us to live according to more altruistic values, ensuring the survival of our species in the long term.

It’s important that we listen and talk with other people while maintaining an open mind, even though we might think differently and disagree on certain issues. It seems to me that one of the biggest problems in the world today has to do with the lack of dialogue between different nations, religions, and other human groups. This lack of dialogue that we experience collectively, is based on a problem that we experience individually – our own lack of dialogue with others and our insistence on closing our minds to the opinions and points of view which are different from ours. In fact, we tend to surround ourselves with people who think and agree with us, even though the best for our own moral, intellectual and spiritual growth, is precisely the opposite – the coexistence with people who think and live differently from us.
One of the obvious consequences of this lack of dialogue is the marginalization of certain groups and people. In some cases this marginalization produces an extreme response – the terrorist act. If we truly wish for terrorism to vanish from the face of the Earth, we must concentrate our efforts in destroying its root, instead of fighting against its consequences. A terrorist act is never one-sided. In one side you will always find the marginalized who accept it and support it; while in the other you will find the people in power who recriminate it and try to detain it. The terrorist act arises from the insistence of those who are in power on not listening and not accepting the points of view of a group of people, whose way of thinking puts into risk their own continuity in power. Obviously, there will always be people who are willing to use violence in order to assert their way of thinking. These are not the real “enemy” though, but those who support and financially assist the terrorist. And it’s these men behind the curtains who we must look for and try to talk with.
While the representatives of our society are not able to just sit down and talk with one another, with an open mind and willing to extend their way of thinking and consequently their way of being, there will be acts of terrorism. It is up to each one of us to work towards dialogue and coexistence with people who think differently from us in our daily lives.

Today I read an article which said that men are promiscuous by nature and monogamous by culture. It seems to me that we humans are unique animals and therefore it is difficult to point a rule of behaviour when we talk about an expression as broad as sex. The sexual conduct of each individual is singular and the result of a variety of factors, including psychological, biological, cultural, and that most of the time fit the needs of a particular social group or even the “level” of spiritual development that the individual has achieved.
The greatest sexual expression that a human being is capable of is the one based on love, even though, many times, we choose to experience it without love. For anyone who has experienced both, the difference is remarkable. One directs us to emptiness, while the other directs us to fulfilment. As we develop ourselves spiritually, we gradually stop seeing and experiencing sex as a primitive need that we need to fulfil at any cost, to gradually see it as an inevitable consequence between to people who love each other and want to be together. Bertrand Russell said that no civilized person could satisfy their sexual instinct without love. And the truth is that the development of morality deepens the way that we express ourselves and sex without love becomes an experience incapable of satisfying us.
Today we live in a society where sexuality is very important. We are constantly exposed to sex through the media and the problems that arise from that are not about sex itself, but the message behind it. In many ways we are led to believe that sex is the centre of our lives and that we are no more than a conglomerate of organs, nerves and hormones, often forgetting that we are so much more than our bodies.
One thing is certain: there are different ways of expressing our sexuality and like everything in life it is determining that we respect, understand and reflect on ways of being and thinking which are different from ours.

All of us can hear it. If only we stop talking and start listening. It’s that inner voice, deep down inside of us, that indicates us our purpose. But we need to be in silence in order to really understand what it’s trying to tell us. And that is such a difficult thing to do in current days – to be in complete silence. Once we can hear His call though, it takes tremendous courage to follow it. After all, its promise is too hard to believe. Unconditional love? Eternal Happiness? Heaven on Earth? How can we with our limited minds even conceive such things? We have grown so used to the idea of an unfair and cruel world, that we now find it hard to picture a world where all people are happy and live to their full potential. No misery, no violence, no fear. Just love. We call it utopia! But isn’t this what we all strive for? Isn’t this what the world is hungry for? If it’s inside of our hearts, it could be here right in front of our eyes. If only we all work for it. If only we all answer our call. God is calling me to do a beautiful work in this world. He is calling me to use all my capabilities and fulfil my potential by improving people’s lives. He wants me to be a part of the change that we will experience in the next few decades. And the direction He is leading me into feels completely wrong. How can my little being make a difference in a world so huge and through such a close-minded system? I guess that that is one of the characteristics of a real call; even though the direction and the means feel utterly wrong and inadequate, you still feel the urge to do it. Will I find the strenght to follow it?
Religion And The Passing Of Ethics & Moral Values
Published April 21, 2009 Moral And Ethics , Religion , Spirituality Leave a Comment
The term Christ is an attribute. It defines a state which any of us can achieve, similarly to the state of Buddha. Jesus was a man who supposedly achieved enlightenment and therefore become The Christ. As for the historical veracity of the story, it’s impossible to know if such man existed or not. From what I have read the similarities between the different prophets of the different religions are astonishing. If one researches a bit, one will easily suspect that it’s the same story being passed over from country to country, from generation to generation, but with different names and slightly different versions. Independently of the importance we give to these details, it’s undeniable that the essence of the teachings contained in such stories surpasses greatly their veracity. And that is exactly what people around the world should concentrate on in order to avoid conflicts. It’s the essence of the stories – the teachings – what truly matters! I don’t think that Jesus, or any other divinised figure, is God. My limited vision of God is far too limited and at the same time complex to be able to encompass it all in one single man. From my point of view, all religions are a way of man interpreting and dealing with a inherent feeling/instinct that we all have. This feeling – which seems to be the inner certainty of our spiritual nature – is still not understood by science or even ourselves. A genuine religion is a tool through which we explore that feeling and which helps us to materialize it in our daily lives. From my perspective religion can be very helpful, especially in the first phases of our spiritual development. I do believe though that religion becomes an unnecessary bridge to God once we achieve a certain “level” of inner understanding. The downside of religion is obviously that it can lead to separation if used as a mean to achieve a kind of knowledge-superiority in relation to all other creeds of belief. The cult, no matter what the external practices are, must always be directed to our hearts and spirit. It is only then that we finally comprehended that it is the “spirit” what bonds us all.
Sobre el Pensamiento Positivo
Published April 9, 2009 Espiritualidad , Pensamiento Positivo , Ser Humano 1 CommentAparentemente hay un método científico para que nos sintamos más felices. Según un nuevo estudio, si antes de dormir hacemos una reflexión de como ha sido nuestro día, y si la hacemos desde un punto de vista positivo, tendremos sueños positivos, dormiremos mejor, y nos despertaremos sintiendo contentos. Solo necesitamos pensar en 3 cosas positivas que han pasado durante nuestro día antes de dormir y intentar analizar porque han pasado. Al analizar algo positivo creamos más resultados positivos no solo a nivel mental, sino que también a nivel físico.
Peace.
Sobre el Materialismo
Published April 8, 2009 Espiritualidad , Materialismo , Muerte Leave a Commenthttp://www.megaupload.com/?d=9584X4DS (Zeitgeist – Part 1)
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=JMNRWARE (Zeitgeist – Part 2)
—
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=9584X4DS (Zeitgeist – Part 1)
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=JMNRWARE (Zeitgeist – Part 2)
Sobre la Insaciabilidad
Published April 1, 2009 Consciencia , Espiritualidad , Insaciabilidad Leave a CommentSobre el Diseño Inteligente
Published February 20, 2009 Ciencia , Dios , Diseño Inteligente Leave a CommentLike a light into my life,
I never thought that it would feel so bright,
All I wanna do is hold you tight
And I’ll be with you through trouble nights.
Sometimes life it drags you down,
And plays you like a fool,
Makes you feel so empty,
Sometimes it can be so cruel.
So follow me Home,
You’ll never be lost,
We’ll weather the storm,
Whatever the cost,
I won’t walk away,
I’ll stand by your side,
I’m here for you,
The rest of our lives.
Sobre la Abnegación
Published February 18, 2009 Abnegación , Espiritualidad , Felicidad Leave a CommentSobre El Origen Del Universo
Published February 17, 2009 Ciencia , Dios , El Universo Leave a Comment1- Una “inteligencia” transcendente lo ha creado.
o
2- El universo es un producto de la casualidad.
1- La Ley de la Causalidad (para todos los efectos observables existe una causa)
2- La Ley de la conservación del momento angular (fenómenos observados, como el movimiento retrógrado de nuestro sistema solar, son imposibles sin una causa interviniente)
Y por fin,
3 -Las leyes de la termodinámica (conservación de la materia/energía y el aumento de entropía).
Ciencia VS Religión
Published February 9, 2009 Ciencia , El Futuro , Espiritualidad , Religion Leave a CommentWebsites explicativos sobre el tema:
http://www.milksucks.com/
http://altmed.creighton.edu/MilkPasteurization/new_page_3.htm
http://es.youtube.com/watch?v=zDz8YVBA_Pk (My Culture)
http://es.youtube.com/watch?v=AIgYBx2HxP0 (Braided Hair)
http://es.youtube.com/watch?v=ExdsQZARzh0 (The Way You Dream)
"On Small Things With Great Love"
Published January 29, 2009 Dios , Espiritualidad , Mother Teresa Leave a CommentMother Teresa is someone I admire greatly. Everything about her – her amazing work, her words, her humbleness – always leave a sort of fascination in my head. I leave you a very inspiring video of her.
“…It is not how much we do, how big the things are, but how much love we put in the doing. Because, we are human beings, and for us it looks very small, but once it has been given to God, God is infinite, and that small action becomes an infinite action. Because God is infinite, there’s no measure for God. And that’s very important. For everybody, not only for us religious. But for everybody, in every way of life. We have to find santacty in the work that Gods has entrusted to us by giving us a special gift. To each one of us He has given a special gift. Maybe I can peal only potatoes, but I must do that peeling of potatoes beautifully. That’s my love for God in action. It’s not how much we do, but how much love we put in the doing. That’s more important to the almighty God, and to us also…”
Taken from Seal’s latest album ‘Soul’. It’s a real good album and his voice is just great. I love to cook while I listen to it.
Una Misa en el Vaticano
Published January 26, 2009 Cristianismo , Dios , Espiritualidad , Vaticano Leave a CommentSobre la Inteligencia
Published January 23, 2009 El Futuro , Espiritualidad , Inteligencia Leave a CommentHomo Universalis
Published January 18, 2009 Dios , El Futuro , Espiritualidad , Ser Humano 1 CommentSi No Reciclas, No Irás Al Cielo!
Published January 8, 2009 El Futuro , Naturaleza , Reciclaje 2 Comments- Al reciclar una tonelada de papel se salvan 17 árboles.
Israel-Gaza Conflict / The Caged Beast
Published January 7, 2009 Guerra , Paz , Ser Humano 1 CommentYou took my life into Your hands,
And You turned it all around,
And in my most desperate circumstance,
Is where I finally found,
That You are strong enough,
That You are pure enough,
To break me, pour me out and start again,
That You are brave enough,
To take one chance on me,
Oh thank You for my chance to start again.
Sobre El Éxito / Robert Theobald
Published December 18, 2008 Economía , El Futuro , Robert Theobald Leave a CommentOs dejo un website con una entrevista a Robert Theobald:
http://www.scottlondon.com/interviews/theobald.html
Sobre La Naturaleza Del Hombre
Published December 17, 2008 El Bien , El Mal , Thomas Hobbes Leave a CommentLo primero que se me ocurre al leer sus observaciones sobre el hombre es, ¿será que Thomas Hobbes pensaría de la misma manera se viviese en nuestros días? Y la segunda es, ¿somos de verdad simples máquinas que simplemente reaccionamos a nuestros instintos y deseos, o hay una voluntad que los transciende y que nos revela nuestra verdadera naturaleza?
Decir que el hombre es bueno o malo por naturaleza no sólo es ignorante, sino que también es quitarle su sentido de libertad y responsabilidad, atribuyendo sus acciones a una naturaleza que le es de alguna forma lejana. Lo que definimos de bien o de mal suele cambiar con el tiempo y depende de la civilización o sociedad en que estamos, partiendo la mayoría de las veces de la necesidad de una sociedad de garantizar su supervivencia que cualquier otra cosa. Hace pocos siglos atrás la esclavitud no era considerada mala, por ejemplo, y incluso hoy en día en determinadas tribus Africanas el incesto tampoco lo es. Según mí perspectiva solemos considerar ‘bueno’ todo aquello que nos une, que nos hace felices, y que nos ayuda a progresar; pudiendo muchas veces estas mismas consideraciones ser fruto de un pensamiento equivocado (a veces pensamos que algo nos une y nos ayuda a progresar cuando en realidad hace justamente el opuesto, como es el caso de la esclavitud). Y de la misma manera solemos considerar ‘malo’ todo aquello que nos desune, que nos hace infelices, y que es un obstáculo a nuestro desarrollo. ¿Qué son entonces el bien y el mal, sino definiciones abstractas que nos permiten definir a nosotros mismos en el vasto campo del pensamiento? ¿Qué son el bien y el mal sino coordenadas que usamos en el amplio mapa que es la experiencia humana?
La naturaleza del hombre no es buena, tampoco es mala; la naturaleza del hombre simplemente es, tal como todo en el Universo. El bien y el mal son simples juicios de valor que hacemos y que tienen más que ver con nosotros mismos y nuestra manera de pensar que con el objeto observado. Por otro lado, si estamos dispuestos a profundizar dentro de nosotros mismos, comprenderemos que el bien y el mal no son más que las dos caras de una misma moneda. De hecho no sabríamos lo que es el bien si no existiese el mal; de la misma manera que no sabríamos lo que es el calor, si no existiese el frío. No somos naturalmente buenos, tampoco somos naturalmente malos; tal como no somos naturalmente bonitos ni feos. Hay incluso un dicho que dice que la belleza está en los ojos del que mira. Y yo digo que el bien y el mal también están en los ojos del que mira.
“…El bien es siempre el bien, sea cual sea el camino que a Él nos conduce…”
Sobre Las Posessiones
Published December 16, 2008 Economía , Espiritualidad , Possessiones 1 Comment
Nuestro Potencial
Published December 12, 2008 El Futuro , Espiritualidad , Evolución Leave a CommentTodos Somos 1 – Part 1
Published December 10, 2008 Dios , El Futuro , Espiritualidad Leave a CommentLos Pilares de la Ideologia del Futuro
Published November 18, 2008 El Futuro , Espiritualidad , Política Leave a CommentUn Nuevo Sistema
Published November 17, 2008 Capitalismo , Comunismo , Crisis , El Futuro Leave a CommentEl Ser Humano y la Igualdad
Published November 1, 2008 El Futuro , Igualdad , Ser Humano Leave a Comment
Mientras no seamos capaces de reconocernos a nosotros mismos en los demás, no seremos capaces de una compasión genuina. Aunque la gente no dé mucha importancia a los actos buenos o malos, la practica de la compasión es la forma más efectiva de defender los intereses no solo del prójimo, sino que también de uno mismo. Cuanto más interdependientes seamos, más redundará en nuestro propio provecho el velar por el bienestar de los demás.
La compasión genuina tiene su base en el reconocimiento de que los demás tienen el mismo derecho a ser felices que nosotros. Los valores bondadosos – como la tolerancia, la paciencia y la compasión – son esenciales si realmente deseamos vivir en un mundo pacifico. La practica de estos valores nunca es signo de debilidad, sino de victoria. En la vida cotidiana, conforme se gana en paciencia y tolerancia, gracias a la sabiduría y al valor, se comprobará que ahí radica la autentica fuente del éxito. Cuando nos motiva la bondad, los resultados de nuestros actos redundarán en provecho de cualquiera y no sólo de nuestros intereses y fines inmediatos.
Es esencial que seamos capaces de reconocer y de perdonas los actos ignorantes del pasado, pues de este modo ganaremos la fortaleza para resolver los problemas del presente de forma constructiva. Uno debe utilizar su energía y existencia en pos del bien y del provecho de los demás, ya que ayudando al prójimo, en realidad uno se ayuda a si mismo.
Dios es la inteligencia suprema, causa primera de todas las cosas. Es lo que no tiene principio ni fin, lo desconocido. Dios es infinito en sus perfecciones, pero lo infinito es una abstracción, y por lo tanto decir que Dios es lo infinito equivale a tomar el atributo por la misma cosa, y definir una que no es conocida por otra que no lo es bastante. La prueba de la existencia de Dios se puede encontrar en un axioma que aplicamos a nuestras ciencias: no hay efecto sin causa. Busquemos entonces la causa de todo lo que no es obra del hombre, y nuestra razón nos lo contestará. Para creer en Dios, basta pasear la vista por las obras de la creación. El universo existe; luego tiene una causa. Dudar de la existencia de Dios equivaldría a negar que todo efecto procede de una causa, y sentar que la nada ha podido hacer algo.
Atribuir la formación primera de las cosas a las propiedades intimas de la materia, equivaldría a tomar el efecto por la causa, pues esas mismas propiedades son un efecto que debe provenir de una causa. Otro absurdo sería atribuir la formación primera de las cosas a una combinación fortuita de la materia, pues la armonía que regula las partes del universo, revela combinaciones y miras determinadas, y por lo mismo, un poder inteligente. Atribuir la formación primera al acaso es un contrasentido; porque el acaso es Ciego y no puede producir los efectos de la inteligencia. Un acaso inteligente no seria ya el acaso!
Se juzga la potencia de una inteligencia por sus obras, y no pudiendo ningún ser humano crear lo que la naturaleza produce, la causa primera ha de ser una inteligencia superior a la humana. Cualesquiera que sean los prodigios hechos por la inteligencia humana, tiene una causa esta misma inteligencia, y cuanto más grande sea lo que ella haga, tanto mayor ha de ser su causa primera. Esta inteligencia es la causa primera de todas las cosas, cualquiera que sea el nombre con la que la haya designado el hombre.
El hombre todavía no está apto a comprender la naturaleza intima de Dios, pues para eso le falta el sentido. Cuando el espíritu no esta ya ofuscado por la materia y cuando por medio de la perfección se haya aproximado a ella, la verá y comprenderá. La inferioridad de las facultades del hombre no le permiten comprender la naturaleza intima de Dios y en la infancia de La humanidade, confundelo a menudo el hombre con la criatura cuyas imperfecciones le atribuye; pero a la medidad que en él se desarolla el sentido moral, su pensamineto penetra mejor el fondo de las cosas y se forma de ellas una idea más exacta y más conforme con la sana razón, aunque incompleta siempre. A pesar de todo, y a través de la razón, podemos conocer algunas de las calidades de Dios.
Dios es eterno; porque, si hubiese tenido principio, hubiera salido de la nada, o hubiese sido creado por un ser anterior. Así es como, de grado en grado, nos remontamos al infinito y a la eternidad. Dios es inmutable; porque, si estuviese sujeto a cambios, ninguna estabilidad tendrían las leyes que rigen el universo. Dios es inmaterial; es decir, que su naturaleza difiere de lo que llamamos materia, pues de otro modo no sería inmutable; porque estaría sujeto a las transformaciones de la materia. Dios es único; porque, si hubiese muchos dioses, no habría ni unidad de miras, ni unidad de poder en el gobierno del universo. Dios es omnipotente; porque es único. Si no tuviese el poder soberano, habría algo más poderoso que él o tan poderoso como él; no habría hecho todas las cosas, y las que no hubiese hecho, serían obra de otro Dios. Y por ultimo Dios es soberanamente justo y bueno. La sabiduría providencial de las leyes divinas se revela así en las más pequeñas, como en las más grandes de las cosas; y esa sabiduría no nos permite dudar ni de su justicia, ni de su bondad.
Todos los hombres poseen el sentimiento intuitivo de la existencia de Dios. ¿Dónde proviene ese sentimiento si no estuviese basado en algo? Este sentimiento es una consecuencia del principio de que no hay efecto sin causa, y el hecho de que incluso los salvajes lo posean es la prueba de que este no es un resultado de la educación o un productor de las ideas adquiridas. Si el sentimiento innato que todos poseemos de la existencia de Dios fuera un producto de la educación o de la experiencia, entonces no seria universal y, tal como las nociones de la ciencia, existiría únicamente en los que hubiesen recibido semejante instrucción.
Ser o no ser; ésa es la cuestión!
Published October 27, 2008 Consciencia , William Shakespeare Leave a Comment
No hay nada en la vida que tengamos que ser o hacer, excepto lo que estamos siendo y haciendo en este preciso momento. La mayoría de la gente que conozco busca incesantemente conocerse a si misma. Sin embargo, uno es el propio conocimiento. Y eso no puede conocerse a si mismo; ya que eso es si mismo. Uno no se puede encontrar a si mismo en el pasado o en el futuro. El único lugar donde uno se puede encontrar es en el momento presente.
Hace mucho tiempo un famoso escritor dijo que ser o no ser era la cuestión. Y la verdad es que esa es la más importante decisión que cada uno de nosotros debe tomar en cada instante. No importa lo que los demás están siendo o haciendo, no importan las circunstancias a nuestro alrededor; lo más importante es lo que nosotros mismos somos en cada momento. Cuando dejamos de preocuparnos con lo que los demás están siendo o haciendo en cada momento y simplemente nos concentramos en lo que nosotros mismos estamos siendo, la vida se simplifica enormemente y finalmente nos conocemos a nosotros mismos como los creadores de nuestra realidad. Cuando por ejemplo, algo que definimos como malo pasa en nuestras vidas, no nos debemos ver como victimas. Por el contrario, debemos buscar y utilizar ese momento, para experimentar y revelar al mundo la parte de nosotros mismos que deseamos ser. ¿Quien soy yo en este momento? Esa es la más importante decisión que debemos tomar. ¿Soy el amor? ¿Soy el egoísmo? ¿Soy la paciencia? ¿Soy la indiferencia?
Cuando sabemos verdaderamente quién somos, vivimos una vibrante y permanente sensación de paz. Podemos llamarla alergia, porque la alegría es eso: una paz vibrante de vida. Es la alegría de conocernos a nosotros mismos como la esencia de la vida antes de tomar forma. Eso es la alegría de Ser, de ser quien realmente somos. Cuando miramos a un árbol por ejemplo, somos conscientes del árbol. Cuando tenemos un pensamiento o sentimiento, somos conscientes de ese pensamiento o sentimiento. Cuando tenemos una experiencia buena o mala, somos conscientes de esa experiencia. Estas declaraciones parecen a la primera vista correctas y evidentes; sin embargo, si las examinamos de cerca descubrimos que, sutilmente, su propia estructura contiene una ilusión cuando se usa el lenguaje. Pensamiento y lenguaje crean una aparente dualidad y una persona separada donde no lo hay. Lo cierto es que uno no es consciente del árbol, o del pensamiento, o del sentimiento o de la experiencia. La realidad es que uno es la consciencia en la que – y por la que – esas cosas aparecen. A través de nosotros mismos la consciencia informe se hace consciente de si misma.
La consciencia pura es la Vida (Dios) antes de manifestarse, y esa Vida (Dios) mira al mundo de la forma a través de nuestros ojos, porque esa consciencia (Dios) es quien nosotros somos. Cuando nos conocemos como Eso (Dios), empezamos a reconocernos en todas las cosas. Es un estado de completa claridad de percepción. Ya no somos más las entidades con una gravoso pasado, convertidas en una pantalla de conceptos que interpreta cada experiencia. Al conocernos como la consciencia en la que ocurre la existencia fenoménica, nos libramos de la dependencia de los fenómenos, nos liberamos de la búsqueda del “Yo” en las situaciones, los lugares y los estados. En otras palabras: lo que ocurre o deja de ocurrir ya no es tan importante. Las situaciones pierden su gravedad, su seriedad. Finalmente dejamos de ser una construcción de nuestro entorno y reconocemos al mundo como la arena en la que nos creamos a nosotros mismos en cada instante.
Ser o no ser es la cuestión! Yo soy el amor. Yo soy la vida. Yo soy la felicidad. Y por lo tanto, buscar por estas cosas fuera de mí no solo es desnecesario, sino que también es imposible. El amor, la vida, el conocimiento de uno mismo no es algo que se puede conocer, simplemente es algo que se puede ser.
Hermann Minkowski y el Cono de Luz
Published October 24, 2008 Albert Einstein , Ciencia , Espiritualidad , Hermann Minkowski 1 Comment
Desde muy joven que tengo un interese especial por la ciencia. De hecho, la ciencia nunca me ha parecido inconciliable con la espiritualidad. Siempre me ha parecido que la ciencia nos ayuda a profundar nuestros conocimientos sobre el universo y que estos nos ayudan a entender por que somos como somos y por que estamos aquí. Recientemente he leído algunos trabajos de Hermann Minkowski, un matemático alemán cuyos trabajos realizados en la teoría de la relatividad de Einstein fueran notables.
El principal descubrimiento de Einstein es que la velocidad de la luz es absoluta, es decir, que es la misma para todos los observadores. Sus estudios nos indican que el tiempo y el espacio son relativos (y no absolutos como antes se solía pensar), pues en realidad dependen de la velocidad del observador. La teoría de la relatividad explica que el tiempo pasa más de espacio para un observador que se mueve, relativamente a un observador que no se mueve. Einstein ha creado una paradoja para ilustrar las consecuencias practicas de esto:
Dos gemelos. Uno se queda en la Tierra mientras que otro viaja hasta otro planeta a una gran velocidad. Mientras que para el gemelo que viajó han pasado 5 años (por ejemplo), para el gemelo que se quedo en la Tierra ha pasado mucho más tiempo, porque el tiempo propio del gemelo de la nave espacial (debido a su rapidez) va más lento que el tiempo del que permanece en la Tierra y, por tanto, el de la Tierra envejece más rápido que su hermano. Si el gemelo que viajó pudiese superar la velocidad de la luz, podría incluso volver a la Tierra y verse a si mismo antes de partir.
Hermann Minkowski ha explorado las ideas de Einstein y ilustró el espacio-tiempo como una figura que llamó de cono de luz. Este cono ilustra un evento aislado que ocurre en un punto aislado del espacio-tiempo. A partir de ese evento, si movemos los ojos hacia arriba en el cono, veremos todas las consecuencias futuras del evento. Si movemos los ojos hacia abajo, veremos todos los eventos pasados que pueden haber influenciado el evento en cuestión. Otros conos estarían por encima y por debajo de este cono y simbolizarían otros eventos pasando simultáneamente, en otros puntos del espacio-tiempo.
Escribo sobre esto para explicar que estos eventos a que Hermann se refiere no son más que formas de energía – nuestros pensamientos, nuestras palabras y nuestras acciones presentes, tienen obligatoriamente una repercusión en el espacio-tiempo a nuestro alrededor, aunque la mayoría de nosotros no seamos conscientes de ello. Estamos cambiando el universo continuamente. No es el tiempo y el espacio lo que se mueve, sino que somos nosotros que nos movemos a través del espacio y del tiempo. Al tener esto en cuenta nos vemos forzados a aceptar que nada es permanente y que todo depende de nosotros mismos; de lo que pensamos, de lo que decimos, y de lo que hacemos.
Podemos cambiar el futuro hoy mismo si así lo deseamos. ¿Por qué esperamos?
Tal como Díos, todos nosotros somos creadores. Creadores de nuestra realidad. Cada pensamiento, cada palabra, cada acción, tiene una influencia en el universo a nuestro alrededor. La cuestión es: ¿creamos nuestra realidad conscientemente o inconscientemente?
Cuando miro a mi alrededor me parece que la respuesta es que la mayoría de nosotros crea su realidad inconscientemente, dejando su persona ser un resultado de su entorno, en lugar de hacer que su entorno sea un resultado de su persona. La mayoría de la gente vive subordinada a las condiciones externas y a la voluntad del “sistema”. Todos hablan y tienen consciencia de que un cambio en el mundo es necesario, todos ansían en su interior por ese cambio, pero muy pocos hablan de y hacen un esfuerzo por cambiarse a si mismos. ¿De qué nos vale hablar sobre la injusticia o la pobreza en el mundo (por ejemplo), si no estamos dispuestos a cambiar nuestra manera de vivir? ¿De qué nos vale saber que somos compasivos si no lo ponemos en practica?
Frecuentemente escucho que un esfuerzo individual es inútil para que el mundo cambie y que en realidad la responsabilidad es del gobierno y de los que tienen “poder”. Pero al afirmar esto nos estamos olvidando de que cada uno de nosotros tiene el poder de cambiar la realidad a su alrededor. Hasta que no seamos capaces de vernos a nosotros mismos como responsables por lo que pasa en el mundo, el mundo no cambiará. Es extremamente importante que entendamos que lo que pasa en el mundo es un reflejo, o una amplificación, de lo que pasa en nuestras vidas diarias. Y hasta que no cambiemos nuestras vidas diarias, la vida del conjunto tampoco cambiará.
Pensamientos. Palabras. Acciones. Los tres son formas de creación. Es benéfico entender que estos ocurren continuamente. Jamás cesan. Incluso en los momentos en que aparentemente estamos inmóviles. Cada pensamiento, cada palabra, cada acción es creativo. Cada uno de estos tres elementos nos recrea y también a la realidad a nuestro alrededor. A cada momento estamos cambiando. El futuro se produce a través de pequeños momentos y no a través de un único y gran momento o decisión. Y es a estos pequeños momentos que debemos prestar atención. A nuestros pensamientos, a nuestras palabras y a nuestras acciones.
El futuro reside en la mano de cada uno de nosotros. ¿Cómo deseamos que sea el futuro?
Profesar o no una religión es obviamente un derecho individual y no necesitamos ser religiosos para que nos desarrollemos espiritualmente, siempre y cuando asumimos la importancia de la compasión y hacemos un esfuerzo por evolucionar conscientemente. Creo firmemente que después de que logramos un determinado grado espiritual, la religión se convierte en un puente desnecesario hacia Díos. Sin embargo, la religión puede ser una buena manera de recordarnos a nosotros mismos que hay algo más en la vida de lo que nuestros ojos ven. Frecuentemente, al olvidar la religión, estamos olvidando también valores humanos profundos, y eso puede ser un problema.
En la actualidad tendemos a conceder demasiada importancia a la obtención de conocimientos y nos descuidamos a la hora de obtener y de desarrollar valores humanos saludables. Me parece que esto sucede porque ese siempre ha sido el papel de la religión – transmitir valores humanos profundos a sus practicantes. Sin embargo, en nuestra sociedad el agnosticismo es cada vez mayor y por lo tanto es muy importante para nuestra supervivencia que elevemos los valores humanos más profundos, que antes eran transmitidos a través de la religión, a la categoría de ética civil, permitiendo que todos tengan acceso a ellos y que estos dejen de ser el privilegio de una minoría. En esto, las instituciones educativas tienen un papel determinante.
Es urgente que repensemos nuestra educación y que enfoquemos nuestros esfuerzos en propagar de alguna manera la esencia de la bondad humana a las generaciones futuras.
Si hiciéramos un simple y único cambio en nuestra consciencia podríamos solucionar los problemas del mundo en muy poco tiempo. Y esto es algo que la mayoría de las personas sabe a un nivel profundo de consciencia, pero que no es capaz de aplicar de manera funcional en sus vidas diarias. Creo que lo que necesitamos es un nuevo tipo de espiritualidad que sería muy benéfica para nuestro planeta. Hablo de un nuevo entendimiento de Dios y de lo que Dios “quiere”; una nueva perspectiva sobre la vida y para que sirve en realidad la vida; una nueva consciencia de nosotros mismos, de quien verdaderamente somos y cual es nuestra verdadera relación con los demás, con Dios y con la vida.
Estos nuevos entendimientos, que serían generados por una nueva espiritualidad, podrían cambiar el mundo. Sería imposible que las personas del mundo se tratasen como se tratan hoy en día si supiesen y entendiesen porque lo hacen. Pero no lo saben. La mayoría de la gente ve al “enemigo” en los demás, en lugar de en si mismo. De hecho, en algunos casos, llegan incluso a ver al enemigo como alguien subhumano, como un infiel, como alguien que no merece ser tratado de forma humana y que debería ser muerto o eliminado por ese motivo.
Y por eso, un cambio fundamental en la manera como nos relacionamos con los demás necesita pasar. Necesitamos cambiar nuestra consciencia y crear una nueva historia cultural que nos redefina. Mucha gente ya habla de un cambio en la consciencia de la Humanidad que está a pasar en este mismo instante, pero tiene que ser más rápido y suceder a una escala mayor. Cada uno de nosotros debe contribuir para acelerar ese proceso para que crezca de manera exponencial. Si no lo hacemos entonces la vida en el planeta Tierra tal como la conocemos podrá muy bien ser eliminada antes de que podamos poner una solución en practica.
En este momento hay una gran fuerza en el universo humano que se mueve en el lado extremo de todos los aspectos sociales, políticos, económicos y espirituales que conocemos. Hablo de extremistas cuyos puntos de vista no son meramente inusuales o revolucionarios, pero que son extremos. Y estos individuos son personas que de verdad creen que la violencia es un medio apropiado para solucionar las diferencias que existen en el largo espectro del pensamiento humano. Son estos extremistas que han creado mucho del terror que encontramos en nuestras vidas diarias. Y delante este tipo de extremismo es difícil saber lo que hacer. Tenemos que volver a una posición incomoda. Los que se sienten cómodos son en un determinado sentido los condenados. Es decir, están condenados a una vida de mediocridad. Es una triste verdad que por estar acomodadas, la mayoría de las personas en nuestra sociedad vive una vida poco excepcional. Son los que se sienten incómodos los que agitan y que siempre lo harán. Y son los extremistas en el medio de estos individuos que se sienten incómodos los que llegan a medidas extremas de manera a hacer los que se sienten cómodos, incómodos.
Y por eso lo que necesitamos hacer es volver a sentirnos incómodos sin que sea necesaria la violencia para que lo hagamos. Es una triste observación que muy poca gente se siente incomoda sabiendo que 400 niños mueren de hambre a cada hora en nuestro planeta. O que muy poca gente se sienta incomoda con la opresión de las masas y con el prejudicio que ocurre en muchas partes del mundo. En el estado en que está el mundo nos sentimos demasiadamente cómodos y no prestamos atención al sufrimiento de las masas. Nos hemos convertido salvajemente auto-indulgentes. Sin embargo, cuando hay que solucionar un crisis bancaria mundial somos capaces de unirnos y solucionar el problema rápidamente.
Por eso la solución es que todos los que se sienten cómodos, encuentren un nivel de malestar suficientemente profundo que les motive a levantarse, a cruzar la habitación y empezar a hacer algo, en lugar de simplemente pensar o hablar sobre lo que pasa en el mundo y no hacer nada. De lo contrario los que se sienten incómodos serán extremos en sus reacciones, y cambiarán el mundo muy rápidamente en un lugar donde ninguno de nosotros jamás se volverá a sentir bien. Este cambio que es una nueva perspectiva y una determinación para hacer algo… no apenas meditar o estar delante una vela con buena música y hablar de como es bello el mundo… pasa por salir a la calle, donde se encuentra toda la basura, y empezar a contribuir de forma practica para estas alteraciones en nuestras vidas diarias.
La Humanidad! ¿Cuál es nuestra definición de la Humanidad? ¿Donde empieza la Humanidad? ¿Con el genio y el compasivo? ¿Y donde termina? ¿Con el loco y el bruto? Si decidimos incluir en nuestra definición de la Humanidad sus representantes más bajos, como los idiotas y los dementes, porque no incluir algunos de los animales superiores, muchos de ellos superiores a muchos de nuestros especimenes humanos? Simplemente con mirar a los animales basta para desarrollar una especie de respeto por ellos. Aunque no tengan nuestra complejidad racional, viven en armonía según la ley natural, algo que a nosotros nos cuesta mucho lograr.
Es importante que repensemos nuestras relaciones con los demás seres vivos.
As beings of restricted though it is virtually impossible for us to grasp what we define as God. This does not mean that we are not able to know some of Its “qualities”. The moment we try to intellectualize God, we actually stop doing it, because God is known through our emotions, not our thoughts. God speaks to everyone at all times. The question is not who does God speak to, but who actually listens to God. And to answer this question emotions are our best indicators. He who listens to his emotions is the one who listens to God! We let our thoughts corrupt our emotions and that is what keeps us from experimenting our true nature – unity with God. And this is the reason why people of simple thought are the ones to have the deepest faith.
Everyone listens to their emotions; few people follow them though! Emotions are God’s voice. It is the feeling of compassion that we instantly feel when we see a homeless person in the street and automatically makes us want to help them and share what we have with them. It is the feeling of protection that immediately invade us when we look at a newborn or a child. Or the feeling of sadness and immorality that we can’t help but feel every time we see animals in a slaughterhouse. The bewilderment that follows when we exceed ourselves. The love we feel for our parents. The excitement we feel whenever we kiss another human being. The restfulness that accompany us before death.
We should follow our emotions more often.
John McCain or Barack Obama. One of them will be the next president of the United States. It doesn’t matter who it is, he who is chosen will have to deal with the war in Iraq. Even though the media doesn’t report on it as often as it used to (and as a consequence of this many people perceive it as a distant event of the past) the war is still going on and costs hundreds of lives every month. As we get closer to the American presidential elections the question seems to gain strength: what will be the development of the war in Iraq?
One of the main reasons why the war started was to fight for world freedom. The idea was to impose a democracy to a country ruled by a tyrant. Peace however, can never be a product of violence, for violence only generates more violence. Moreover, a political system of the democratic kind is a natural consequence of the social development of the people of a certain country, and not something that you simply learn independently of what your moral foundations are. For this reason you can’t really impose democracy to people who do not possess the moral and ethic foundations to live by it. How do you teach philosophy to a child? The answer is that you don’t! You let the child grow first and once the child has the verbal and cognitive foundations to understand what philosophy is, you may then teach him/her.
There used to be communism in Europe, and back then, its people didn’t need the help of an alien power to get out of it. It happened “naturally”, at its own time, when the majority of people came to the realization that that type of ideology didn’t reflect their identity and finally stood up to the system. Same thing will happen in due course to Middle Eastern countries (and other countries around the world) which live under tyrannies, such was the case of Iraq.
Whether the next president of the United States decides to continue or to end the war in Iraq, it won’t change the fact that its people are not ready for a democracy. Let each country’s people decide upon the fate or their own country and not force upon them our social and moral ideologies, no matter how good we think they are.
The biggest problem in the world has to do with the simple fact that we believe to be separate from the things around us. That includes other people, animals, nature, and God. This general belief makes us treat others in a different way than the way we treat ourselves. That of course, is not a bad thing, for it enhances our sense of individuality and allows us at some point to experience union and completion with everything. It is in fact essential for us to experience one (separation) in order to experience the other (union). After all, would we know what cold is if there wasn’t any hot? Therefore, treating and seeing others in a different way isn’t necessarily a negative thing. However, doing the exact same opposite will make life on planet Earth incredibly better.
If before doing something we would simply ask ourselves – would I like it if someone would do this to me? – life as we know it would improve dramatically. At a deep level of consciousness all of us know this. Nonetheless, few know how to apply this knowledge in a functional way to their daily lives. To do this, a change in consciousness needs to take part in each and every single one of us, individually, and one by one. We need to make our actions match our consciousness. It is my belief that a new type of spiritually is silently arising in our planet. As we deepen our understanding of the world and our emotional and moral sense and relations, so does our understanding of God and our existence. As a consequence of this religion becomes increasingly dissatisfying when it comes to answer our most basic questions. Who am I? Why am I here? Where am I going? Why is there so much pain the world?
The deepening of our understanding is inevitable. There is nothing that we can do that will ever stop us from evolving. It is an intrinsic part of human nature. However, how fast or how slow it happens will actually depend on each and every single one of us. It will depend on our efforts to live consciously and to promote a new way of living and acting towards others and the things around us. If we all lived according to what we already know deep down inside – that we are all part of the same thing, that we are all one – the basic questions I presented above would in fact answer themselves.
Who am I? You are love…
Why am I here? You are here to love…
Where am I going? You are not going anywhere, for there is no place to go, except the place where you are now…
Why is there so much pain in the world? Because you don’t love…
We have the power to make the world a better place. If only we love others as we love ourselves!

To forgive, to forgive, to forgive. Always to forgive. Two, three, one hundred times. To forgive until we forget what it means to forgive. Because it is in forgiveness that we free ourselves. It is in forgiveness that we find our true nature. All of us have made mistakes at some point in our lives. All of us have caused pain to somebody else. It is important to remind ourselves that we need to be the creators of everything that we wish to experience and therefore we can’t expect forgiveness from others if we are not willing to forgive in the first place! I meet many people who have difficulty forgiving their loved ones. But if we are not able to forgive those who are close to us and whom we love, how will we be able to forgive those who are not close to us and for whom we don’t feel any type of affection? Forgiveness is one of the most beautiful gifts that God has given us, for it allows us to move on and to become better versions of ourselves. In a certain way it is the highest demonstration of love that one human being can show for another. So let’s forgive those who have hurt us in the past and permit our hearts to rest in peace and happiness.

Once upon a time… a lecturer starts a conference by holding a brand new 500 Euros note in the air. He then says to the audience: – If you would like me to give you this note, please raise your arm. The answer was unanimous, everyone raised their arm. The lecturer then crushed the note with his hands, making it look wrinkled and used. He asked the audience: – Does any of you still wants this note? Everyone raised their arm again. The lecturer then threw the note on the floor and stepped on it several times, making it dirty. He then asked: – What about now, do you still want it? The audience responded affirmatively again. The lecturer proceded to explain this unusual introduction:
- It doesn’t matter how much I damage this note, you will still want it. No matter what I do to it, it won’t lose its value. This also happens with us during the course of our lives. People step on us and make us feel diminished and unimportant. But in the end none of it truly matters, because as human beings we will never lose our value. It doesn’t matter if we are dirty or crushed, it doesn’t matter if we are big or small. None of that matters! None of that will ever alter the value that each and everyone one of us has. The value of our lives resides not in what we appear to be, but in what we do and know. Now think about this. Can you name the five richest people in the planet? What about the name of the last five Miss Universe winners? What about the ten last actors to receive an Oscar? The name of the last ten Nobel prize winners perhaps? As you can see we don’t really remember these people. However, you will probably remember the name of three teachers who had an impact in your life. And you will also remember the name of five individuals who made you feel special at some point in your life. The same with five individuals with whom you share your time, or five people who helped you out in the course of your life. It’s those who worry about us, those who take care of us, and in some way stand by our side, that truly matter in our lives. Therefore it is inevitable that we ask ourselves, who do we want to be? Do we want to be the rich and recognized person who no one remembers, or the person who loves and takes care of others?




























































.jpg)




























































